https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/
Old website I know, but still...
-He promotes debunked bazant
-He promotes proven fraud NIST
-He thinks WTC 7's exterior didn't fall at freefall
-He promotes the Orwellian BBC WTC 7 documentary (his part is literally just using ad homenen for 30 seconds on the set of Hardfire and nothing else)
-His page on the WTC 7 foreknowledge lacks discussion of the "special engineer" Peter Hayden described, his unknown identity and and his actions on 9/11.
-Falsely quotes firefighters describing the smoke on the south face of WTC 7 to imply seeing literal flames engulfing the whole building.
-Said "It's possible that I know more about the events of 9/11 than anyone in the world"
Why does ISF link to such failure?
Old website I know, but still...
-He promotes debunked bazant
-He promotes proven fraud NIST
-He thinks WTC 7's exterior didn't fall at freefall
-He promotes the Orwellian BBC WTC 7 documentary (his part is literally just using ad homenen for 30 seconds on the set of Hardfire and nothing else)
-His page on the WTC 7 foreknowledge lacks discussion of the "special engineer" Peter Hayden described, his unknown identity and and his actions on 9/11.
-Falsely quotes firefighters describing the smoke on the south face of WTC 7 to imply seeing literal flames engulfing the whole building.
-Said "It's possible that I know more about the events of 9/11 than anyone in the world"
Why does ISF link to such failure?
via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/2px28CD
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire