mercredi 30 novembre 2022

Firefox crash notice?

For the last couple of days I've been getting a popup from "Mozilla Crash Reporter." I don't use Firefox. It's certainly possible something I run in the background could be trying to use it since it is installed. I'm going to uninstall, but any thoughts on what might be causing this? Malware?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/PmyUtfT

SCOTUS to decide if Legislatures own election rules

https://www.rawstory.com/moore-v-harper-2658805721/

Imagine an America where state legislatures could require everyone vote only by touching their nose. Or Muslims could not vote. Or only one drop box in high-poverty areas.

Violates the state constitution? "Sorry, not our problem."

That's what the SCOTUS will be deciding on soon. Whether the state legislatures have the constitutional power to write ANY election laws they like, and these laws are totally and utterly immune from any judicial review, including from the Supreme Court.

Am I being hysterically hyperbolic? Nope. Some of these states want to do some really ****** stuff and if we give them that power they will wield it.

Luckily the Constitution says that Congress can write the rules regarding Congressional elections. Kind of hard to see how the Supreme Legislature Theory can get around that. They'd have to have a separate election day for Congressional and Presidential elections. Or make everyone leave the voting area and come back in so as to comply with the different rules.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/Rti5x2d

[Split Thread] The search for rare unvaccinated blood

Here is a similar case going to court in New Zealand.
The quest for rare unvaccinated blood.

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politi...PWF3EXDDNEXSM/



via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/bxMFjko

mardi 29 novembre 2022

The best (least worst) case for the 9/11 truth claims

We are often accused of attacking easy target when we criticise 9/11 truthers. But the fact is they are all easy targets, it's just that some of the sillier ones are more entertaining.

I thought that I would bring together the things the more persistent players in the 9/11 truth movement would regard as their best case and see how it looks. These have been gleaned mainly from the ironically titled Beyond Misinformation.

The first is, of course, WTC 7 which the 9/11 truth folk seem to regard as vessel which will carry all their hopes and aspirations. Prove that 7 is a demolition, they say, then all the others will start to fall in place - WTC 1 and 2, the Pentagon, Flight 93, JFK and so on and so forth.

For a best case it seems remarkably weak, its basically

WTC 7

- It fell at freefall acceleration for 2-3 seconds
- It fell symmetrically
- Some people reported hearing explosions
- Steel frame buildings don't collapse due to fire.
- The Hulsey Report
- It collapsed suddenly
- No one expected it to collapse.
- A lot of people expected it to collapse.
- "Sulphidation" of steel in rubble.

WTC 1 and 2

- They collapsed vertically, with sudden onset of collapse.
- Collapsed at near freefall acceleration
- Debris fell almost entirely into the footprint
- Explosive ejections outward with most debris falling well outside the footprint
- They collapsed through the alleged "path of least resistance"
- "Dustification"
- Bodies of victims pulverised and some remains found scattered widely on roofs of buildings
- Lots of people reported explosions at various times
- The simple collapse model allegedly shows the buildings would not collapse
- "Missing jolt"
- Molten material seen pouring from one particular corner of WTC 2
- Molten metal reported in the rubble for up to months after the collapse.
- Nano thermite allegedly detected in dust.
- High heat

The first thing to notice is that some of these things are contradictory. If debris was not forced outward during the initial collapse of the top part, where did they expect it to go? Straight down? Through the alleged "path of most resistance"?

Or the way that the collapse of WTC 7 was an unexpected event that lots of people expected. Of course they expected it because they were experienced emergency responders who had made careful inspections, both externally and internally, of the extent of the fire and the damage. So it was not expected and there is nothing sinister about the fact that it was expected.

But the main thing is that all of this is better explained by the damage and fires caused by the impact of commercial airlines, flown in at high speed and at an angle calculated to create the most damage or, in the case of WTC 7 damage caused by extensive fires and by the impact of debris from the collapse of WTC 1.

None of the truthers are willing to be anything but vague about the kind of setup of explosives and/or thermite would fit the observational evidence we have of the event. And no one will explain how explosives and or thermite can keep metal molten and cause high temperatures in the ground for months afterwards. However the raging fires in the rubble and the compressed combustible material from hundreds of collapsed floors can easily explain this. Neither would explain molten steel, so whether this was a fiendish conspiracy or not, the molten metal was not steel.

Obviously we could go into detail on any of these claims but this has been done again and again over the years. Most of it more than it needed to be. A single paper in an open access chemistry journal would never be considered adequate evidence for anything.

Even the "best case" for the 9/11 truth movement is unbelievably flimsy after 20 years.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/ufv5nxp

What is ‘real socialism’?

It's quite amazing to see people who are leftists, which by definition makes them statists, fling the word 'authoritarian' around without a hint of irony.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/3dtq8Kl

The innocence of Michael Stone

No not that Michael Stone convicted of murder the other Michael Stone convicted of murder, for the killing of Lin and Megan Russell (and also of the attempted murder of Josie Russell).

The case was one of the notorious trifecta of UKian murder cases of the 1990s, along with Colin Stagg and Barry George, both later cleared despite police obstructionism.

Th case against Stone, a fairly terrible human being, was weak to the point of non-existence; a dubious witness, a bootlace never connected to him and a trio of prisoners who alleged they heard Stone confess (one admitted lying , one was paid and the third even the prosecution admitted was unreliable).

Stone continued to maintain his innocence and has refused to apply for parole.
More.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/EsLSKUQ

Christians now minority in England and Wales

The various Christian sects and cults are no longer, in toto, a majority of the population of either England or Wales, according to the most recent census data.
It is the first time that fewer than half of the population have described themselves as Christian.

The census data showed a drop of ~5.5 million people (around 17%) in the number who self-describe as "Christian" and a ~1.2 million (43%) rise in the number of people who describe as Muslim (a total of around 3.9 million).

Meanwhile around 37.2% of people (~22.2 million) declared they had "no religion", now the second most common response (after 'Christian').
It means that over the past 20 years the proportion of people reporting no religion has soared from 14.8% – a rise of more than 22 percentage points.
Though there's also the ~6% who just don't answer the question.

Expect the Usual Suspects to panic and lie. Again.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/AepSIPb

NYC DoE gives students BC

Every now and again I come across a culture war story where it's a bit hard for me to intuit why people are actually upset in the first place.

Quote:

New York City’s Department of Education has been providing birth control (such as the long-lasting shot Depo-Provera), Plan B/emergency contraception, and “all pregnancy options” to thousands of high school students in grades 9-12, without parental consent or notification through the Connecting Adolescents To Comprehensive Health (CATCH) program.
https://www.libsoftiktok.com/p/nyc-s...-students-plan

I suppose some parents—having failed to pass on the virtue of celibacy—were hoping for the chance to have the chance to veto medical care which might well prevent STIs & pregnancy...?

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/09zBV3k

lundi 28 novembre 2022

Body Dysmorphia (BBC Horizon)

Came across this old episode of BBC Horizon today, full video available at the Internet Archive. The episode summary and transcript are available here and the basic gist is that a documentary crew followed around an American woman named Corinne and a middle-aged psychotherapist named Gregg as they sought out a surgical solution to the problem of having two healthy legs.

The consulting psychiatrist is a fellow named Russell ReidWP, who would go on to get in a spot of bother with the General Medical Council. Reid is careful to point out that these patients are neither delusional nor psychotic:
Quote:

These people are not mentally ill in the sense of having a serious mental illness or psychosis. They're not hearing voices, they're not deluded. It's not as if some force is telling them to have their limb off and they're following their paranoid delusion to do that. If that were the case then they would be psychotic, but they're not like that.
He does call their condition a disorder, however.

It would be fascinating (IMO) to see how these patients have gotten on all these years later.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/zfXJl0w

Ademola Adedeji

If this story is right, and I see no reason it's not, the UK seems to be in a contest with America for worst treatment of minority groups.

Eight years jail for joining a chat group and being angry at the death of a friend.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/called-hi...194313102.html


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/lWLAh7Y

If free will is a myth, someone should make a scientific justice system

One that recognizes that nobody really chooses to do what they do, and that true scientific justice can't demand they be accountable for their actions.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/fUn4WTO

Question on the theory of bases on Mars?

When did this conspiracy first begin?

That the USA or 'earth' had bases on Mars?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/O9MxZs0

The Confession-Prime documentary

A fascinating two part Prime documentary about the trial of Keith Hall for the murder of his wife in England in 1992.

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-r...me-documentary

Quote:

As we move into episode two, we are six months on, which the mercurial Keith deems an appropriate amount of time to wait before rejoining the dating scene. He answers a lonely hearts ad, writing to the woman that she might have seen him on the telly. By the time they meet for a drink, she has alerted the police and been replaced by “Liz”, an undercover officer wearing a wire. Some weeks later, “Liz” tells Keith that her uncertainty about whether Pat might return is preventing her from committing to the relationship. Keith reassures her that this is not a problem because, he says, he strangled Pat and burned the corpse.
The confession was declared inadmissible by the judge as the suspect was considered to be interviewed and was not cautioned. He was found not guilty.

This is a case where I think the suspect was guilty, but the police ****** up so badly the judge had no alternative but to dismiss the recordings.

It’s a documentary worth watching in any case.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/dkAGiUD

dimanche 27 novembre 2022

Reading anthology for language study

I've been studying the German language for the last four years while living in the US. (I came in the US at the age of 28 in 1998 primarily to learn English).

The last four years I've been trying to put different levels of emphasis on reading, listening and practice. Of course practice really lacks. So I'm mostly experimenting in reading and listening, that is between reading and listening contemporary material and classic material. (Literature x radio).

I can't seem to gain the momentum I want. My goal is to reach proficiency in understanding rather than speaking. It's going slow.

I started thinking maybe I should read poetry. Poetry is more intensely speaking to the imagination and emotions than prose. I think the more vividly I expose my mind to the target language the more it will stick, and the more in-context it'll be.

Unfortunately I can't benefit from my experience in learning English. Because I learned it while living it, so that experience is not helping me much with this struggle.

If anyone has an opinion on using my study time with German anthology (primarily) I'd like to hear that. Thank you.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/ZcU8Sb6

samedi 26 novembre 2022

Is there a name for the fallacy of assuming one is too stupid to have done something?

I believe there was a word describing this sort of situation where one insists someone could not possibly have achieved something, because they were either "too stupid", "too poor", or "too primitive", etc. Despite lots of evidence that they did, in fact, achieve that thing.

One example I recently came across: "William Shakespeare could not have written his plays because he was too poor to have been that well educated." Now, I know there is PLENTY of evidence that he really did write his plays. This is NOT a thread specifically about Shakespeare. What I want is the term describing that sort of bad argument. Googling the idea did not seem to come up with anything.

I recall another potential example, from a long time ago, where I believe I first heard the proper term, but I cannot remember what that term was. That example went along the lines of "The pyramids of South America could not possibly have been built by ancestors of the current native tribes, because they are all too primitive to have done so.", which of course, is also probably not true, according to actual evidence. But, is a similar fallacious line of thinking.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/sOyALZg

Graham Hancock's "Ancient Apocalypse" Nonsense

Jack of Twitter fame endorsed this series last week, embarrassing himself, and ensuring a new generation falls for Graham Hancock's pseudoscientific nonsense.

Couldn't find a thread on it, and thought we should have one in the public section.

I was into debunking Hancock about 20 years ago, and fear I may have to write something up. Anyone found any good debunkings to save me the effort?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/bcy4Tv6

14 people charged with murder of an 8 year old Queensland girl.

I’m going to follow this with great interest.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-11-...rial/101671336

Quote:

With her long dark hair, pink Tweety Pie cap and Dora the Explorer shirt, eight-year-old Elizabeth Struhs looks like a happy little girl in a family photograph.

But her cheeky smile is hard to reconcile with the harrowing evidence presented in a Queensland regional court over the past two months, as one after another, 14 people were committed to stand trial for her murder.

The young girl was found dead in a Rangeville home in Toowoomba on January 8 this year after her life-saving insulin was allegedly withheld by a group of people who claim to love her and trusted God to heal her.
Interestingly they haven’t named the cult, but it’s certain to come out.

These evil bastards will hopefully serve long sentences. Also interestingly, they have also refused legal representation, trusting in god to protect them.

Well done Queensland police and prosecutors. For those unaware of this state, it is full of rednecks, has had fundamentalist leaders (Joh Bjelke-Peterson) and is home of racist politician Pauline Hanson. The temptation to brush this evil crime under the carpet must have been strong.

Right now I’m shedding real tears for Elizabeth.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/BqL1ArS

vendredi 25 novembre 2022

Problem Solvers Caucus

Quote:

Problem Solvers Caucus

Beginning in 2017, the Problem Solvers Caucus became an independent member-driven group in Congress, comprised of representatives from across the country – equally divided between Democrats and Republicans – committed to finding common ground on many of the key issues facing the nation. Co-Chaired by Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), the Caucus’ aim is to create a durable bloc that champions ideas that appeal to a broad spectrum of the American people. It is a group united in the idea that there are commonsense solutions to many of the country's toughest challenges. Only when we work together as Americans can we successfully break through the gridlock of today’s politics.

https://problemsolverscaucus.house.gov/about

Comments welcomed:


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/vqYmLHa

Died Suddenly - The Loose Change of Covid-19?

Recently, a Facebook acquaintance posted (or tried to post) a link to the documentary released on Rumble called Died Suddenly.

Of course he announced it as "WhaT ThE maINsTREAM MeDIa WON't Let YoU SeE!" and then when I gave some pushback he resorted to "OKaY THEN Go LinE up AND GET yoUr bOosTER!!"

I'm not going to bother linking to it myself, but it is probably pretty easy to find.

Link to a Twitter account that gives a very brief run-down mocking its silliness.

I only watched about 10 minutes or so and thought it was dumb...

A montage of crap about JFK, Bigfoot (no, really!), Building 7, UFOs, Bill Gates, Thomas Malthus.

Apparently the idea is that the Covid vaccines are there to depopulate the world, very slowly, by putting clots that have never been seen before, in humans, by a funeral director called John O'Looney.

No one really knows why John O'Looney, funeral director, is telling people not to get vaccinated, but a cynic might think he has a conflict of interest.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/Cil8dGk

[Continuation] The Trials of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito: Part 32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stacyhs (Post 13952401)
Yeah, and Francesco attended his dear brother's memorial as evidenced by the photo of him coming out of the church!

http://www.internationalskeptics.com...01887804a1.jpg


The ballerina botherer and his vast, storied team of Italian lawyers & analysts were really on top of their game with that one, weren’t they?! :D



via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/OXEApg3

mercredi 23 novembre 2022

Highly successful SF election manager fired for being white

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/san...al-equity-plan

Everyone admits that this guy was an incredible success. Great at his job and much better than his predecessors

They decided to let him go because his existence did not comply with their racial equality agenda.

This is terrible. Highly qualified individuals with an exceptional track record of bringing good things to the people should not lose their jobs because they are the wrong skin color.

:(


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/vfaecGS

mardi 22 novembre 2022

You can reject a refutation of a claim without believing the claim itsellf

I don't know why this even needs to be said, but apparently it does.

For example, on Twitter Sam Harris offered an argument as to why there is no afterlife. I pointed out that his argument worked for neither the Christian nor the Muslim conceptions of an afterlife. Someone responded and said the burden was on me to prove there is an afterlife. I said I don't believe there is an afterlife, to which he responded "So now you are backtracking".

It happens again and again. If I say that the Bible does not imply that pi is equal to 3 then I am assumed to be a Bible inerrantist.

If I say that time paradoxes do not prove that time travel is impossible people immediately that I am saying that time travel is possible. If I say.there is a perfectly good definition of God I am assumed to believe in God.

This attitude implied that if someone says "We know the Earth is spherical because the Bible tells us so" and I point out that this is not a good argument then this means I must be a flat earther.

No of course it doesn't. But why is it so difficult for people to understand this?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/tL4s9Uo

Kanye West Confirms Presidential Run, Enlists Milo Yiannopoulos for His 2024 Campaign

Another black hole of stupid is forming. Two of the world's biggest attention whores join forces.

Kanye West Confirms Presidential Run, Enlists Milo Yiannopoulos for His 2024 Campaign

Quote:

After unsuccessfully running for president in 2020, Kanye West is giving it another go in 2024.

The rapper confirmed his upcoming campaign to paparazzi over the weekend, according to Consequence of Sound. “Yes… It’s simple…. It’s just we’re moving toward the future,” he said when asked if he’s running.

Additionally, Ye revealed that alt-right political figure Milo Yiannopoulos “is working on the campaign.” Yiannopoulos, a former Breitbart senior editor, most recently worked as an intern for Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene.

West and Yiannopoulos have yet to post on their social medias about their political relationship.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/8l4sdi9

Tax Software Sends Info To Meta (Facebook)

Quote:

Tax Filing Websites Send User's Financial Information To Facebook

Major tax filing services such as H&R Block, TaxAct, and TaxSlayer have
been quietly transmitting sensitive financial information to Facebook when
Americans file their taxes online, The Markup has learned.

The data, sent through widely used code called the Meta Pixel, includes
not only information like names and email addresses but often even more
detailed information, including data on users’ income, filing status, refund
amounts, and dependents’ college scholarship amounts.

The information sent to Facebook can be used by the company to power
its advertising algorithms and is gathered regardless of whether the person
using the tax filing service has an account on Facebook or other platforms
operated by its owner Meta.

Each year, the Internal Revenue Service processes about 150 million
individual returns filed electronically, and some of the most widely used
e-filing services employ the pixel, The Markup found.

About as secure as the back of a pickup on the wrong side of the tracks
in an unlit area of the town overnight.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/stQSnMg

Sam Bankman-Fried

As of this writing, as far as I know, he is a free man and no warrant for his arrest has been issued. But I can't imagine he won't end up in a court of law at some point. Certainly he will be sued. In fact, there is already a lawsuit that names celebrities and sports teams that had endorsement deals with FTX as co-defendants.

Sam Bankman-Fried tries to broker FTX bailout from his home in the Bahamas, despite being booted from the crypto company (CNBC)

Quote:

Sam Bankman-Fried is hunkered down in an upscale neighborhood of Nassau [in the Bahamas], still scrambling to raise billions to plug a hole in now-bankrupt FTX.
Who is he? Well his parents are both very respectable people. Law professors at Stanford University. (Wikipedia)

He was also very prominent as a philanthropist in the "effective altruism" movement. (The New Yorker)

Was he just very sloppy, or malevolent? Was it a Ponzi scheme by design or just a terribly run business?

FTX’s Balance Sheet Was Bad (Matt Levine in Bloomberg)

Quote:

But there is a range of possible badness, even in bankruptcy, and the balance sheet that Sam Bankman-Fried’s failed crypto exchange FTX.com sent to potential investors last week before filing for bankruptcy on Friday is very bad. It’s an Excel file full of the howling of ghosts and the shrieking of tortured souls. If you look too long at that spreadsheet, you will go insane.
I quite like this bit:
Quote:

If you try to calculate the equity of a balance sheet with an entry for HIDDEN POORLY INTERNALLY LABELED ACCOUNT, Microsoft Clippy will appear before you in the flesh, bloodshot and staggering, with a knife in his little paper-clip hand, saying “just what do you think you’re doing Dave?”
Sam Bankman-Fried, the disgraced boy king of crypto, explained (Vox)

Quote:

A week ago, Sam Bankman-Fried was the boy-wonder face of crypto: A 30-year-old who founded one of the biggest cryptocurrency exchanges in the world, a celebrated philanthropist worth an estimated $16 billion, and a major Democratic donor who quickly found favor in Washington. By Friday, he was at the center of an epic flameout that left his empire and his image as an uncannily sharp, altruistic billionaire in ruins.

In the annals of crypto disasters, the tale of Bankman-Fried may go down as one of the most jaw-dropping. He resigned from his crypto exchange, FTX, as it collapsed from a domino effect of a surge in customers trying to withdraw their funds, and the company filed for bankruptcy. The Wall Street Journal has reported that Bankman-Fried may have illegally taken about $10 billion in FTX customers’ funds for his trading firm, Alameda Research, whose future is also in peril. And Bankman-Fried is now worth close to nothing.

The downfall of FTX isn’t a typical story of crypto’s volatility or investor risk-taking; it didn’t crumble due to bad luck, but what now appears to be unsustainable layers of deception. On the surface, FTX appeared to be thriving — in the past year, it made several high-profile acquisitions and bailed out other failing crypto companies. In reality, it was drowning in debt. At least $1 billion in customer funds is reportedly missing. The stunning contrast between image and reality has resulted in Bankman-Fried facing a reputational fall from grace swifter than any in recent memory. According to reporting from several news outlets, the DOJ and SEC are investigating FTX, and his friends and admirers in crypto, philanthropic, and political circles have quickly begun distancing themselves from the man widely dubbed the king of crypto.
The do-gooder movement that shielded Sam Bankman-Fried from scrutiny (Washington Post)

Quote:

During Bankman-Fried’s ascent, media portrayals invariably noted that the crypto wunderkind drove a Toyota Corolla and planned to give his billions away, even as he courted celebrities and Washington power brokers. Indeed, his proximity to EA’s brand of self-sacrificing overthinkers often helped deflect the kind of scrutiny that might otherwise greet an executive who got rich quick in an unregulated offshore industry.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/LAbdDWs

lundi 21 novembre 2022

Researchers Say They Are Close To Reversing Aging

There have been various threads on this topic over the years, but rather than reviving an old thread I thought I may as well start a new one.

This is a report by NBC News. I wonder if it's anything to get excited about?
Apparently they have managed to make rats younger. They show two rats which we are told are the same age, but one clearly appears to be younger than the other. Also, the researcher is at Harvard, if that makes any difference.
[yt]DPARs7mL_7Q[/yt]

Quote:

Researchers at Harvard University are investigating whether human genes could reverse the effects of aging. NBC Medical Fellow Dr. Akshay Syal got exclusive access to their lab to discuss the future of how to defy aging.
If you'd rather not watch a 7-minute video, I found an article in the MIT Technology Review:
How scientists want to make you young again

And another from CNN:
The ‘Benjamin Button’ effect: Scientists can reverse aging in mice. The goal is to do the same for humans

Will it happen sooner or later than practical energy from nuclear fusion? Or, indeed, at all? Maybe aging is simply inevitable?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/NT5bGdz

dimanche 20 novembre 2022

Horse Racing is a Cruel and Sadistic Industry

Content warning: animal cruelty

Yep. I said it. I do not support the horse racing industry in any way and I think it should be outlawed. Here's just the latest good reason:

Jockey Ric McMahon sentenced over possession of jigger at Birdsville Race Club

Quote:

A Brisbane jockey has been fined $5,000 and had a conviction recorded for possessing a banned electrical device at Birdsville racetrack.

Ric McMahon, 34, appeared via telephone in the Mount Isa Magistrates court on Monday afternoon after pleading guilty to one count of possessing a prohibited thing at a licensed venue.

Mr McMahon was photographed with an electrical prod, or "jigger", at the Birdsville track on August 30.

A jigger is a small taser-like device that can be used to administer an electric shock to a horse to condition it to run faster.

The possession or use of jiggers is banned in horse racing.
While it is great that this bloke has been nicked for electrocuting horses, it is a monetary fine only, a slap on the wrist. He should be barred from racing for life. And this is just one issue. There are many, many more.

This gets a little hard to watch at times, but it summarises my position on racing in general, and the Melbourne Cup - the race that stops a nation - in particular.

[yt]bDsbWoWPn9U[/yt]
Honest Government Ads (Juice Media) 2:28


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/cNm8XyH

Am I wrong to be freightened of this?

The nightmare scenario.

Trump gets tried for Jan.6 or tampering with the Georgia count and gets convicted.

Before sentencing he starts whipping up his minions and tells them they have to take their country back by storming the courthouse just before the sentencing.

The maga mob gets the message just like they did on January 6 and storm the courthouse.

Am I paranoid?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/mqGYTQ5

samedi 19 novembre 2022

Musk Reinstates Trump on Twitter

Musk has reinstated Trump's Twitter account. Hold on folks; it's going to be a bumpy ride.

I think Truth Social, such as it is, will disappear with Twitter becoming
just another Trump fan site. Sponsors will continue to desert it with the exception of My Pillow and other right-wing companies and I expect a lot of non-Trumpers leaving. What say you?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/F8rR6e2

That will be enough, Mr. Trump!

When the Special Council was appointed to oversee the investigation into the sensitive government documents taken to Mar-a-Lago and Trump's various efforts to obstruct the transfer of presidential power after 2020 DJT immediately publicly excoriated the move as well as the appointee, Jack Smith.

So my questions are: If Trump is charged and brought to trial at what point in the process, if any, may the court require that he stop publicly commenting on the process? This would, in theory, be done to keep the process fair and keep it from becoming too much of a circus.

Can he still rant after charges are brought?

Can he and his lawyers be required to not "try the case on the court house steps" i.e. in the public media?

I already have a thread on this:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com...rt+house+steps

My apologizes to the moderators.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/4TRjvPN

jeudi 17 novembre 2022

[Split Thread] Eliminate hate and injustice?

Edited by jimbob:  moderated content removed

The Gospels are packed full of stories about the Pharisees who were known for their hypocrisy and perjury.

The Pharisees are the archetype for the sort of modern day hypocritical Christians who are so often lambasted here.

It's worth noting that the anger that Jesus expressed towards the Pharisees was because they had corrupted the law of God with their rules and hence were leading the people astray. In effect they were idolizing the law instead of worshipping God.

My take is that Jesus didn't hate them. He was angry with them for what they were doing.

In this way Christianity, practiced as it should be, is not hate, but is the answer to hate.

Oh, my! Is this leading us to a concrete thing we can do to counter hate?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/Yf6KrIo

mercredi 16 novembre 2022

Telling folks what Christianity really teaches is hardly "proselytizing"

Quote:

Originally Posted by arayder (Post 13945068)
The Gospels are packed full of stories about the Pharisees who were known for their hypocrisy and perjury.

The Pharisees are the archetype for the sort of modern day hypocritical Christians who are so often lambasted here.

It's worth noting that the anger that Jesus expressed towards the Pharisees was because they had corrupted the law of God with their rules and hence were leading the people astray. In effect they were idolizing the law instead of worshipping God.

My take is that Jesus didn't hate them. He was angry with them for what they were doing.

In this way Christianity, practiced as it should be, is not hate, but is the answer to hate.

Oh, my! Is this leading us to a concrete thing we can do to counter hate?

Quote:

Originally Posted by arayder (Post 13946401)
....
Telling folks what Christianity really teaches is hardly "proselytizing".

if you had bother to read what I posted and had bothered to read the Gospels you'd know that Jesus forgave the Pharisees, converted a couple and accepted a couple more as his disciples.


Oh where to start oh where....

Other than that the statements are belied thoroughly by what the New Tall tales actually say Jesus said about hating one's own kin an kith to be worthy of the cult leader.... and other than that history definitively rives to smithereens the assertions with christianity's long wide trail and rivers of blood .... not to mention current affairs going on right now too with christianity's injustice and THEOCRATIC FASCISM.... there is of course the glaring No True Scotsman fallacy... or the denial of English language words.

Then there is of course the risible oblivious assertion that excoriating Jews and going around maligning them and promising them with gnashing of teeth and wailing in an ever lasting pit of fire... is justified because they did not accept Jesus' flimflam... and then going on to obliviously state that all this hate and injustice by Jesus... "practiced as it should be, is not hate, but is the answer to hate.... leading us to a concrete thing we can do to counter hate"... :dl:

I wonder how Ananias and Sapphira felt about "Christianity, practiced as it should be"
  • Acts 5:1-11 Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession, and kept back part of the price, his wife also being privy to it, and brought a certain part, and laid it at the apostles' feet. But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land?... And Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost: and great fear came on all them that heard these things.... Then fell she [Sapphira] down straightway at his feet, and yielded up the ghost: and the young men came in, and found her dead, and, carrying her forth, buried her by her husband. And great fear came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things.

I wonder how these words from Jesus calling for hate and JIHAD will "lead us to a concrete thing we can do to counter hate"???
  • Matthew 10:34-39 4 “Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. 36 And a person's enemies will be those of his own household. Whoever loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me, and whoever loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And whoever does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.
  • Luke 14:26 If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters—yes, even their own life—such a person cannot be my disciple.
  • Luke 19:27 But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them—bring them here and kill them in front of me.
  • John 8:44 You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. ...
  • Matthew 15:24-26 He answered, I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel. The woman came and knelt before him. “Lord, help me!” she said. He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.
  • Matthew 8:12 But the children of the kingdom shall be cast out into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
  • John 3:18 ...but He that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
  • Matthew 21-24 Woe unto thee, Chorazin! ... Bethsaida! ...Tyre... Capernaum... shalt be brought down to hell.... I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee.
  • Matthew 27:25 All the people answered, “His blood is on us and on our children!”

I guess... Jesus said it best to describe the extent of benightedness in the above statements...
  • Matthew 11:25 At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/wUydq4t

lundi 14 novembre 2022

World population to reach 8 billion today

Yes, of course that is only an estimate. On an average day about 385,000 babies are born and 185,000 people die, resulting in a net increase of roughly 200,000 people per day.

If you look at this site:

https://www.worldometers.info/

The population as I write this is 7,999,952,800 or so and rising. It should top 8 billion in a few hours. The number is based on U.N. estimates.

Apparently the U.N. like to pick a baby at random born today and declare that "this is the 8 billionth baby". They did it for the 5th, 6th, and 7th billion.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/HT7Um32

Trump's Tuesday announcement... what will it be?

So, before the mid-terms, Trump made a big deal of some announcement that was coming. It was widely thought that it would involve Trump announcing he was going to run for president in 2024. But after the poor showing of Trump-backed candidates in the mid-terms, people are advising Trump not to run.

However, he still has a big announcement planned for Tuesday.

So what do people think this big announcement will be?

- Trump will ignore his advisors that were telling him not to announce the start of his presidential campaign and do so anyways

- He won't outright announce he is running, but will make some vague statement about how he is "exploring his options to run"

- He will announce some lawsuit or legal action (perhaps aimed at various investigations into his crimes). "I am launching a personal injury lawsuit against Garland"

- He will make some business-related announcement, perhaps related to Truth Social, or building a hotel in Russia

- He won't actually announce anything, but just use the time to rant against his "enemies" (Deathsantis, Moscow Mitch, etc.) and/or the mid-terms, perhaps with vague claims of voter fraud (which of course won't be supported by evidence)

- The announcement will be cancelled at the last minute

- He will announce that he is actually an alien from planet X, and will now be returning home

(Admittedly I hate myself a little for wasting the brain cells in order to give Trump attention.)


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/n9vT4Am

Missouri Book Ban Law Proposal

Comment period opens on Missouri Secretary of State’s book ban proposal

Quote:

JEFFERSON CITY — Beginning Tuesday, Missouri libraries and members of the public can formally weigh in on an attempt by Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft to block public funding for libraries if they offer books that might appeal to the sexual interests of minors.
Quote:

The proposed rule would require Missouri’s 160 local public libraries to adopt policies on the age-appropriateness of literature. And under the rule, anyone could challenge access to books.
Quote:

The Missouri Library Association called the rule rule “an infringement on the professional judgment of librarians, and an effort to further stoke division in the communities that libraries serve.”

“This set of new rules for the most part represents an obtuse political effort to catch librarians in the act of being librarians, and to recast that spotlight in a malicious and libelous hue,” the association said in a statement.
Quote:

Comments may be submitted to the Secretary of State’s office via email at comments@sos.mo.gov or by traditional mail to Office of the Missouri Secretary of State, P.O. Box 1767, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Other than this forum, my social media presence is largely read-only. However, if anyone on here feels the need to let Mr. Ashcroft know what they think of his fascist authoritarian BS, I'd be much obliged.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/gtLFBcW

Is violating causality via FTL really a problem? Can someone explain?

I'm trying to think about this, but right away my brain stalls out:

1. I observe an effect, necessarily arising from a cause.

2. I teleport instantaneously to a location in spacetime where the cause has not yet occurred.

3. ???

4. Violation of causality! Everything in the light cone ceases to exist! The universe begins to unravel!

But what actually happens? Or would happen, hypothetically? Theoretically?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/eQmX1px

Intelligence is an Evolutionary Dead End

I started a thread with this subject at Dawkins' forum many years ago.

Dawfins' fan club lost their **** over it at the time, but nothing convinced me I was wrong.

Now, I see NASA largely agrees: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2210/2210.10582.pdf

Quote:

We postulate that an existential disaster may lay in wait as our society advances exponentially towards space exploration, acting as the Great Filter: a phenomenon that wipes out civilizations before they can encounter each other, which may explain the cosmic silence.
Climate change is the obvious Great Filter we're charging towards.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/1szITLY

dimanche 13 novembre 2022

6 Lives and Historic B-17 and P-63 lost in Dallas

Talking about it helps, so just wanted to start this thread.

I was at this show and saw this happen live. Still in shock really.

WARNING: Video in this link is hard to watch.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/b-...ow/ar-AA1436UH


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/hOmJz3n

samedi 12 novembre 2022

The Post-911 Bush/Cheney Commission Interview Summary Declassified

Direct link to PDF of interview summary here:

https://www.archives.gov/files/decla...e-material.pdf

Nothing new, or shocking. No surprises. Not sure why this was classified in the first place.

Here's The Intercept's take on it:

https://theintercept.com/2022/11/10/..._medium=social

Quote:

Perhaps the most interesting passages from the document relate to the extent to which Cheney was empowered to effectively take command authority that morning. Bush said he was pressured to get on Air Force One, so he “made some quick remarks and blasted out of there.” Cheney, he recalled, urged him, “Don’t come home.” Cheney “told him that Washington was under attack. He strongly recommended that the President delay his return to Washington. There was no telling how much more the threat might be. The President agreed, reluctantly.” Once Cheney was at the helm inside the Presidential Emergency Operations Center, an underground bunker beneath the East Wing of the White House, he and Bush discussed the “rules of engagement” for the evolving situation, including confronting other potential hijacked aircraft. “Yes, engage the enemy. You have the authority to shoot down an airplane,” Bush reportedly told Cheney. “The President understood this from his experience in the Texas Air National Guard,” according to the notes. “He had been trained to shoot down planes. He understood generally how this worked — one plane would lock on, one would ID. He understood the consequences for the pilot, how a pilot might feel to get the order to shoot down a US airliner. It would be tough.”


Again, nothing new. :thumbsup:


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/o1FLenV

Trump shirks his duty?

DJT is all over his Truth Social platform claiming election fraud in Arizona and Nevada. . .

Quote:

@realDonaldTrump 15h
The Democrats are finding all sorts of votes in Nevada and Arizona. What a disgrace that this can be allowed to happen!
Quote:

@realDonaldTrump 9h
Idiot, and possibly corrupt, officials have lost control of the tainted Election in Arizona. MACHINES BROKEN IN REPUBLICAN AREAS. A NEW ELECTION MUST BE CALLED FOR IMMEDIATELY!
Quote:

@realDonaldTrump 9h
RIGGED ELECTIONS, OPEN BORDERS = Third World Countries. The USA is a failing Nation!
Quote:

@realDonaldTrump 10h
So in Maricopa County they’re at it again. Voting Machines in large numbers didn’t work, but only in Republican districts. People were forced to wait for hours, then got exhausted or had other things to do and left the voting lines by the thousands. Even Kari Lake was taken to a Liberal Democrat district in order to vote. Others weren’t so lucky. This is a scam and voter fraud, no different than stuffing the ballot boxes. They stole the Electron from Blake Masters. Do Election over again!
So my question is: If Trump has knowledge of election fraud and associated crimes isn't it his duty to report those crimes to the appropriate state and federal officials?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/b4fiyBx

Jewish advocate wants Perth trader in 'Nazi' memorabilia closed down

I received an email from Jamey Blewitt of JB Military Antiques saying that a Jewish lobbyist had been pressurising him to cease trading in certain memorabilia.

Quote:

To all our auction customers, I wanted to speak to you directly in regards to some of the blatant misinformation that has been levelled at us and German collectors in general this week by certain members of both the media and vested Jewish lobbyists in relation to our upcoming 20th November auction. Most notably the Jewish lobbyist Dvir Abramovich has levelled some pretty nasty accusations against us, which are not only untrue, but propagandist to the point of absurdity, which is why I thought it best to refute here, as he will neither return our emails, phone calls or even engage in any form of mutual communication.

For those of you have never come across this person, Abramovich is a Melbourne, Australia based lobbyist who seeks private donations and funding for his 'Anti Defamation Commission', most notably, until recently, when you accessed his webpage, a pop up box would immediately ask you for a donation, so I probably don't need to describe him any further to you. However, he has a major issue with our company and anyone else in Australia/worldwide dealing or collecting German memorabilia from the Third Reich period. Abramovich has but one tactic in his playbook, that is to scream the loudest at anyone such as ourselves, using the national media outlets and webpages, decrying our supposed hatred of the Jewish people and stating that we and others are profiting upon the blood of the millions of jews who were killed during the Holocaust. Here is just a snippet of the latest verbal attack he has launched via the The Jerusalem Post:

“These cursed, blood-stained items, that could have been used to kill Jews and others, may end up in the hands of Final Solutionists who will proudly display them in their homes and use them to recruit new members to their twisted cause.”
Dvir Abramovich, Chairman of the Anti-Defamation Commission

"We should spare a thought for the anguish Holocaust survivors must be feeling right now. And if the owners of this business [JB Military Antiques] took the time to think about the 1.5 million children murdered by the Third Reich and the mothers clutching babies as they were pushed into the gas chambers, perhaps they would reflect about trafficking in these instruments of death and stop playing right into the hands of hardcore bigots who have an appetite for these monstrous symbols,” Abramovich warned.

“The Holocaust is over, but the dangerous ideology that fueled the extermination of millions endures in today’s Australia," he said. "This auction desecrates the memory of the victims and tears to shreds the Australian values of democracy, and these tools of the devil should not be sold to the highest bidder," he said. "This grisly trade has to stop, and we urge all state governments, as well as the Federal government, to immediately stamp out this ghoulish practice by criminalizing the sale of this memorabilia and banning its import.”

The Jerusalem Post 8/11/2022

Jamey Blewitt continues, in his defence:

Quote:

Now, I have never met Abramovich in person, but I have tried in the past to get in touch with him and let him know that I have no problems with Jewish or Israeli people, that I do have a great deal of sympathy for those killed during the Holocaust, from all nationalities, the survivors and families of those involved. I am not a bigot or neo Nazi, don't hate minorities or people who don't collect German memorabilia. In fact, I respect other people's opinions, respect the differences in people and their cultures and think that anyone should legally be able to collect or deal in legitimate militaria or memorabilia, so long as all state, territory and federal laws are followed.

I do not think that collectors of German militaria are doing so to fuel antisemitic causes, nor do I think collectors are deranged or seeking to raise the Fourth Reich. I've given several interviews this week, as well as in the past in relation to the 'type' of collector we deal with (ABC News article) and that as the majority of our customers of Third Reich militaria are average, middle income earning males, aged 30 to 70, none of whom are neo Nazi’s, I would challenge Abramovich and any other parties concerned to let me know of this so called list of such people, so I can have a copy.

Key points from ABC News:

Quote:

The business says its customers are simply military history enthusiasts
A Jewish leader says swastikas are often used to incite hatred and violence against his people
The public display of the swastika is banned in NSW and Victoria

I am on Jamey Blewitt's subscription lists because I have bought Finnish Winter and Continuation War memorabilia from him in the past, albeit just two rare items. I was unable to find them anywhere else, with one medal advertised as 'original' on Ebay, turning out to be an obviously newly minted fake. I certainly have zero Third Reich sympathies. However, the Finnish swastika, which predates the German one and is actually different, being a square shape and not turned 45° to a diamond shape. It is pale blue, not black on a red background.

So given how difficult it is to find such genuine memorabilia, when many collectors will simply be relatives of the fallen, who is right, the Jewish advocates or Jamey Blewitt (who obviously has a vested interested and makes a healthy profit on his auctions)?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/Opwr7PB

vendredi 11 novembre 2022

The DeSantis gambit

If you regard Donald Trump as a uniquely toxic and dangerous threat to the nation, should we starting considering backing Ron DeSantis? He's currently gaining approval among establishment Republicans and major media outlets, provoking the ire of Trump and much of his base. I've also seen many other MAGA people sharply criticize the former president after he introduced DeSantis' new nickname at a Pennsylvania rally last week.

[yt]Vi4DbbAD3QA[/yt]

And the grumblings grew louder after Trump doubled down on his attacks the day after the midterms on Truth Social.

I regard DeSantis as another shameless buffoon. He's done three things that have caught my eye recently though. He's put in work to protect the environment and natural resources of Florida, raised minimum teacher pay, and backed candidates not aligned with Trump. These are things the rightwing base do not normally crusade for. And IMO they provide an opening for liberals and Never-Trumpers to ingratiate themselves with the DeSantis coalition as it may turn out to be.

This I think could backfire if DeSantis decides not to run and backs Trump; he's 44 and he may feel he has plenty of time. It could also backfire if the establishment cannot or will not reign him in and he goes full Trumpist once in power. But I think if there's any opportunity to create a wedge within the Republican power structure, if only to take away a single-digit slice of the general election numbers in 2024, it's now.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/BJGArT7

jeudi 10 novembre 2022

Remembrance Day 2022

They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old:
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We will remember them.

[yt]McCDWYgVyps[/yt]


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/jtFxqVP

Casuistry for 10 virgins and Jesus their bridegroom

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thermal
Jesus loves you, Leumas.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leumas
I assure you it is utterly unrequited love... unlike those five unfortunate virginal brides (Matthew 25) who loved him but whom he refused to let into the bridal chamber because they were not sufficiently oiled like the other 5 virgins and had to go out to fetch more due to his rude inconsiderate tardiness in coming to perform his bridegroom duties on them behind closed doors... and he left them distraught and out in the dark no matter how much they knocked on the door to let them in.

And I am thinking his love is more like that of David Koresh or Jeffrey Dahmer or Jim Jones... DEADLY that is.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Thermal
Ok, maybe he doesn't love you.


But you asserted that he loves me, with such certainty I thought you might have gotten it on good authority??


Quote:

Originally Posted by Thermal
Sidebar: parables really aren't your thing, are they?

Double sidebar: the virgins were bridesmaids, not 10 brides at once for one guy in a wedding. The maids carried lamps to light the nighttime ceremony, not the freaking bride. Did you seriously not understand that or were you just making stuff up?


The above is yet another example of not reading a text properly and reading into it what one wishes it said instead of what the text actually says.

I suggest you read Matthew 25:1-13 CAREFULLY and notice
  • how the text does not say anything about "bridesmaids"
  • but it does say they were all 10 of them virgins going to meet the bridegroom.
  • are "bridesmaids" not allowed to be married or widowed do they have to be virgins... is calling them virgins a relevant point at all if all they are going to be doing is "carry lamps to light the nighttime ceremony"?
  • Matthew 25:10 And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage: and the door was shut.
  • do "bridesmaids" go "in to the marriage" with the bridegroom and they "shut the door"?
  • what were they ready for???
  • Matthew 25:11 Afterward came also the other virgins, saying, Lord, Lord, open to us.
  • why are the other 5 virgins so eager to also enter "in to the marriage" with the other well oiled and ready 5 virgins "behind the closed door" with the bridegroom?
  • why does each one of them need to be well oiled if they are all in the same room holding the lamps for the bridegroom behind the closed door and only the one virgin is being serviced while they all stand there? Don't the 5 lamps light up the room enough???
  • and if the 5 lamps are not enough why does the bridegroom not open the door and let the virgins in then close it again?
  • Matthew 25:12 But he answered and said, Verily I say unto you, I know you not.
  • so he knows the other well oiled 5 virgins but it just happens that those not sufficiently oiled virgins he does not know??
  • why does he need to know the virgins if they are only holding lamps behind the closed door??


Quote:

Originally Posted by Thermal
The maids carried lamps to light the nighttime ceremony, not the freaking bride.


What ceremony??? Why do the virgins need to enter in to the wedding room with the bridegroom??? And why do they need to be virgins??? And why did the bridegroom not let them in when they already became well oiled again??? And why did he close the door with all those well oiled virgins in the room???


Quote:

Originally Posted by Thermal
Sidebar: parables really aren't your thing, are they?


From the above post it seems that you
  1. misread the verses in Matthew 25
  2. made up words that were not there
  3. misunderstood what the parable is about
The parable is about what it actually says it is about
  • Matthew 25:13 Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh.

In other words... it is about the failure of Jesus to arrive on time to perform his obligations and duty as the "bridegroom" on the believers. And the believers' faith dimmed like insufficiently oiled lamps... and Jesus... despite not doing his duty on time and being inconsiderate and rude in his tardiness... punishes the poor believers for not having sufficiently oiled faiths, by leaving them out in the dark despite them begging to be let "in into the wedding behind the closed door" and being well oiled again and ready like the other 5 good and ready virgins.

So as you see the 10 virgins were all meant to be serviced by the bridegroom ... but the 5 who did not have well oiled faith got locked out of the wedding room and not allowed in no matter how well oiled they became later.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Thermal
...Did you seriously not understand that or were you just making stuff up?


is a question that you should be asking yourself.




.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/53Q2yuX

Republican Lessons from the 2022 mid-terms

Ok, they may yet control Congress, but did much less well than expected. What will they have learned?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/tIF4A2w

mercredi 9 novembre 2022

English to Tengwar, and back again

Question for any Tolkien geeks on here:

How best can one translate/transcribe from English into Tengwar, and back again into English by using that translated/transcribed message?

Just transcription will do fine for me, so if there's some easy-to-refer chart that shows what English letters might correspond to the relevant letters in the Tengwar alphabet/script, that would be cool. Or else maybe a website that can directly transcribe the English letters into Tengwar, and back again.

I realize these are languages, not just static codes based off of English. So if there's some website that offers easy-to-use translations, that'd be cool, provided you can also translate back using it into English.

A quick Google search did not really help. That is, there's heaps of sites out there with lots of information, as well as sites that let you directly translate/transcribe, but none, so far as I could make out, that let you translate back into English. If that isn't available, or at least not available easily, then transcription will do fine.

The most promising website seems to be this one, as far as I can make out off of a quick Google search: https://www.tecendil.com/. It's a cool site, very easy to use, but again, they either don't allow for translations back into English, or else I couldn't figure out how. I've written to them just now, asking about it, about whether their site allows translations back into English

Meantime, I was wondering if anyone here might know how to do this.


-----


TLDR: I'm looking for some way, either a chart or else a translator-website, that can translate (or transcribe, either way) messages written in Englsh into Tolkien's Tengwar, and also translate/transcribe that Tengwar message back into English.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/ztRjLq0

MS Word Grammar checker

I work for a large organisations and we use Office 365.

I have an idea to flag up a warning when people use certain words and phrases.

Before I contact the the IT people can word do this?

I don't want autocorrect as I want people to have the choice.

I think I want to add a rule to the grammar checker so a message pops up when words and phrases are used and people then have the choice to amend.

Is this possible?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/m7RVXEs

mardi 8 novembre 2022

Aware II results

Hi,

The AWARE II results are here. No visual hits but it seems that they a production of the brain:

Quote:

Results: Of 567 IHCA, 53(9.3%) survived, 28(52.8%) completed interviews, 11 (39.3%) reported memories/perceptions suggestive of consciousness. Auditory awareness was described by 2/28(7.1%), visual awareness by 1/28(3.5%). Four categories of experiences emerged: 1) emergence from coma during CPR 2/28 (7.1%), or 2) in the post-resuscitation period 2/28 (7.1%), 3) dream-like experiences 3/28 (10.7%), 4) recalled experience of death 6/28 (21.4%). In the cross-sectional arm, 126 community CA survivors’ experiences reinforced these categories and identified another: delusions (misattribution of medical events). Pilot testing for explicit recall and implicit learning during CPR occurred in 64%. As regards explicit recall, nobody identified/recalled the correct visual image, 1/28(3.5%) identified/recalled the correct auditory stimulus. Despite marked cerebral ischemia (Mean rSO2=43%) and predominately absent cortical activity (suppressed EEG), near-normal EEG (delta, theta, alpha) consistent with consciousness emerged up to 35-60 minutes into CPR. Conclusion: Consciousness and awareness may occur during CA. The recommencement of near-normal/normal EEG may reflect a resumption of network-level of neuronal and cognitive activity, a biomarker of reported lucidity/consciousness, and recalled experiences of death (“near-death” experiences).
Source: https://www.abstractsonline.com/pp8/...esentation/249


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/6JlKST2

USA members: Did you vote?

Mrs. Shemp and I went out for breakfast, then over to the local school to vote. Not much of a line, so it only took a few minutes. Of course, we voted for all the Democratic candidates, and we stopped to wish the Democrats holding campaign signs outside good luck.

Did you vote? Are you going to vote? Or are you an apathetic fool who doesn't think it matters?


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/opru5Ps

Jordan Peterson Event Report

A friend of mine suggested this event, which was originally scheduled for April but had to be cancelled. I had encountered Peterson during the Covid year, while surfing through Youtube. I found him an interesting and entertaining lecturer/philosopher, and I was particularly struck by how thoughtful he was in the sense of thinking hard about what he was saying and attempting to be very precise in his language. I definitely found that it took several watchings to fully process the videos.

Tonight's event was at the Arizona Financial Theater, a 5000-seat venue that appeared to be nearly full. Seats were very cramped; this ain't like your local AMC. Fortunately we were in the nosebleeds and there was some space there so we could manspread a bit. Crowd was mostly male but a lot of girlfriends and wives, definitely mostly but not exclusively 20s-30s.

Event started with about twenty minutes of classical guitar by a Canadian artist whose name I forget. Not bad, but I've seen Al Di Meola so not likely to be impressed.

Peterson's wife came on to do the introduction but first some business about the apps that they are coming up with... and then Jordan himself enters.

Mostly standing ovation but not with roars or anything like that. Definitely a positive crowd. This is about 8:15 or so, about 45 minutes after I had hoped things would get started.

Jordan goes into a spiel about the new videos he's doing on Exodus (the chapter in the Old Testament). There were some interesting bits comparing totalitarian regimes like Ancient Egypt with Nazi Germany, but I think for the most part it fizzled, and seemed nothing like a lecture on the stated topic (Which Was 12 More Rules for Success) and more an ad for his next video. Still he is a spellbinding speaker and goes off onto wild and interesting tangents, so the 45 minutes devoted to the actual lecture went by fast.

And then we got to the Q&A and here Peterson became more interesting (and I hope less scripted although the format leaves the question quite open). His wife pulled upvoted questions off their app (a little cross-selling there), and the first one was how do you choose between the right wife and the hot wife. Much amusement in the crowd but Peterson riffed off the question brilliantly. First he went onto the obvious point that everybody wants their wife to be hot, but they'd prefer not them not to be so hot that everybody else is coming onto her, or she might realize she can do better. So their men will undercut them a bit--try to convince their girlfriend /wife that he is actually better than they deserve.

Peterson's suggestion: Don't try to convince your girlfriend that she doesn't deserve you because you are putting both of you down. If you really don't believe you deserve her, try upping your game. Roar of applause, and it's hard to argue he didn't hit the nail. OTOH, the whole answer took about 20 minutes because he went off onto this long tangent about how some men might balk at telling their wife how hot they look because they are worried this might be indulging their lust. My eyes definitely glazed over there.

One thing I should mention is that although it took place the night before election day there was virtually no mention of politics at the event. Peterson did mention something the Far Left believed but it was in the context of what several other groups believed and just an aside. Zero mention of the election, zero mention of Republican or Democrat although it's pretty obvious from the associations that he mentioned (Ben Shapiro's the Daily Wire is apparently hosting his series on Exodus) that he is on the right.

I will also say that although religion was a constant background theme it was not at all preachy despite the "12 More Rules" title. Peterson explained it more as learning to listen to your conscience when faced with difficult decisions in life. Not consult this psalm, or ask WWJD. Zero sense this was some sort of religious revival.

At about 9:30 his wife cut him off and the event was over.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/rhxm17C

lundi 7 novembre 2022

International Labour Crisis

If you've been awake for last six months, you'll be aware that there is presently a massive need for workers across the developed world.

USA, Canada, Australia, NZ, UK, France, even Japan is finally seeing it as well.

Covid is clearly to blame for the suddenness of the crisis, but it had been getting close to boiling just before covid hit, so the root problem is much earlier than 2020.

This table, from USA, shows where the growth is going to be over the next decade, and that matches with what I know from NZ, Aussie and UK, with an additional bit missing that seasonal labour won't grow a lot, but their shortages are even greater than the ones shown.

The problem I have is that solving the OECD's crisis by stealing all the competent people from developing nations is just shifting the problem onto poor countries, whose infrastructure is already a mess. One lesson the world failed to learn from covid was the need for co-ordination between health authorities, and if we rich countries destroy the systems inside developing nations, I fear it will be to our detriment over time.

Not only don't I have an answer, I'm not even sure one exists.

The other problem which isn't being mentioned anywhere is infrastructure. Canada may have the luxury of being able to build infrastructure for the 1.5 million incoming people, but if NZ hired 150,000 people right now they better want to live in tents and **** in a hole, because it will take us a lot longer to build the infrastructure to handle the people than it will to hire them.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/slRX6Mp

Man arrested for Delphi murders

Getting out ahead of this one because it will at some point go to trial. This is the case of the murders of Abby and Libby in Delphi, IN, 5 years ago

https://www.cnn.com/2022/10/31/us/de...-police-update

A Delphi resident has now been arrested. The police are being very tight-lipped on the evidence. It's pissing a lot of people off who think they are entitled, but they want to secure the conviction and don't want to screw anything up.

There are a lot of questions and rumors (did his wife turn him in? She had to have recognized him in the video that they had), but that's about it.

This happened fairly local to me (I drive by the Abby and Libby Memorial Softball fields on occasion, and my wife spends some time in Delphi now and then), but we don't know anything more than anyone else. We're waiting for the trial, which is supposed to be in the spring.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/CeGUYWm

dimanche 6 novembre 2022

Homeland Security Admits It Tried to Manufacture Fake Terrorists for Trump

Homeland Security Admits It Tried to Manufacture Fake Terrorists for Trump

Quote:

The Department of Homeland Security launched a failed operation that ensnared hundreds, if not thousands, of U.S. protesters in what new documents show was as a sweeping, power-hungry effort before the 2020 election to bolster President Donald Trump’s spurious claims about a “terrorist organization” he accused his Democratic rivals of supporting.

An internal investigative report, made public this month by Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat of Oregon, details the findings of DHS lawyers concerning a previously undisclosed effort by Trump’s acting secretary of homeland security, Chad Wolf, to amass secret dossiers on Americans in Portland attending anti-racism protests in summer 2020 sparked by the police murder of Minneapolis father George Floyd.

The report describes attempts by top officials to link protesters to an imaginary terrorist plot in an apparent effort to boost Trump’s reelection odds, raising concerns now about the ability of a sitting president to co-opt billions of dollars’ worth of domestic intelligence assets for their own political gain. DHS analysts recounted orders to generate evidence of financial ties between protesters in custody; an effort that, had they not failed, would have seemingly served to legitimize President Trump’s false claims about “Antifa,” an “organization” that even his most loyal intelligence officers failed to drum up proof ever existed.


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/WlSoKCA

[Split Thread] Miscarriages of justice from false confessions and subsequent retractions

I just watched a case of Forensic Files that reminded me somewhat of Amanda and Raff 's case:

In 1963, man in Australia named John Button found his girlfriend, Rosemary Anderson, lying dead on the side of the road one night after she'd walked away after an argument. He put her in his car and took her to the hospital. The front of his car had considerable damage which he claimed had happened weeks before. There was also a little blood on the damaged area which Button said must have dripped onto it when he carried her to the car.

The police interrogated him, including hitting him once in the stomach. After 4 hours of being yelled at and told that they knew he had done it, he said he realized they weren't going to stop so he confessed saying he had only meant to scare her but lost control of the car and accidentally hit her.

The on-scene police officer examined the car damage and believed it was not consistent with having hit a human body but he wasn't asked about it at trial. Button had reported an accident that caused front end damage to his car, but no hood damage, to the police three weeks before Rosemary was run down but the police considered this irrelevant, and this report was never presented at trial.

He was convicted of manslaughter with his confession and the car damage being the only evidence against him. He was sentenced to 10 years at hard labor. While in prison, another man, Eric Cooke, who was scheduled to be executed for murder, confessed to having run down the girl on purpose and described her as having hit the hood of his car before flying over the roof of his car. The police told the man to take them to the scene of the murder but he identified the wrong area of the road. The police didn't believe him. At his execution, Cooke swore on a Bible that he was the one who hit Rosemary.

Button was released for good behavior after serving 5 of the 10 years sentence. He got married and had a couple kids but was severely depressed due to still being convicted of a crime he said he didn't commit and tried to kill himself. Luckily, he survived.

Three decades after being released, a reporter looked at Button's case and started investigating. She discovered that six women had been run down on dark roads before Rosemary but they had all survived. Cooke had confessed to all six.

One of the world's leading experts on accident reconstruction, Rusty Haight, flew to Australia from Texas where he used a biomedical human form dummy and three same make and model cars as Button was driving to reconstruct the crime. All three showed that Button's car could not have hit Rosemary. But when the make/model car that Cooke said he had been driving was used in three tests, the dummy did exactly what Cooke said Rosemary's body had done: hit the hood leaving a large dent then had flown up and over the hood. The body landed in exactly the position Button had described he found Rosemary in.

Button was fully exonerated by Australia in 2002 and awarded a few hundred thousand dollars. At first Rosemary's parents refused to believe Cooke, and not Button, had killed their daughter. But after meeting with the Button and Cooke families and the Director of Public Prosecutions, they finally accepted the truth.

Button now heads the Australia Innocence Project. But I'm sure there are some people who still think he's guilty and just looking for attention. :rolleyes:





via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/5BfAPxH