The Trials of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito: Part 27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Numbers (Post 12070204) Which is why: 1. The Hellmann court verdict of guilt for the charge of calunnia against Lumumba was arbitrary; 2. The ECHR will have one more reason, if it wants to list them all, to find that Amanda's conviction for calunnia was unfair under the Convention and allow her to request a retrial. Arbitrary judgments of conviction are always considered unfair by the ECHR.

I seem to remember reading that Hellmann regretted convicting Amanda of calunnia but I can't find it now. Does anyone else remember this?

This thread continues from here. As usual the split point is arbitrary and participants are free to quote from previous iteration[s] of this thread.

Posted By:zooterkin

via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/2Au456a