Proof of Immortality, VII

Yet another segment of the immortal thread. As per usual, the position of the thread split was arbitrary. The previous segment is here.

Posted By:jsfisher

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jabba (Post 12087340) - Hopefully, we're getting down to the "nitty gritties" of our disagreement. Again, my objective right now is to nail down our different basic disagreements. - There is at least two issues in this 'one' disagreement:#1. How many potential loaves of bread are there -- i.e., how many different loaves of bread could we make if we never ran out of time or the necessary conditions?

Suppose, for the sake of argument, one were to make an exact copy of Jabba. There would be thus Jabba the original and jabba the copy both identical. So far so good?

Jabba the copy must perforce be an exact copy of Jabba the original in every respect, else it would not be a copy.

Therefore , Jabba-1 is exactly the same as Jabba-2. Jabba the first must perforce be exactly the same as Jabba the second, right? Perforce, they must be identical. Else, Jabba-2 must not be an exact copy of Jabba-1, right? If Jabba-2 is in any way different from Jabba-1, then Jabba-2 is not a copy in any way. Do you grok that?

via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/2zxtUpT