|Continued from here. As usual the split point is arbitrary and participants are free to quote from previous iteration[s] of this thread.|
Originally Posted by Vixen (Post 11936340)
It matters not a jot how intentional their usage. A judge does not have the authority to change a law.
Nowhere in Art 530,2 do the words 'did not commit the act' appear.
There is no way Marasca or you can wish it so.
Della rubric per non a vere I ricorrenti commesso il fatto
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/2vNIxQk