Largely inspired by the o.j simpson case.
Let's say you are a juror on a murder trial and shortly before you retire to reach a verdict, it is found that key evidence was tampered with. There is other strong evidence that the defendant did commit the murder, but how would you vote?
Let's say you are a juror on a murder trial and shortly before you retire to reach a verdict, it is found that key evidence was tampered with. There is other strong evidence that the defendant did commit the murder, but how would you vote?
via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/2ro5fO5
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire