5G Risks (SciAm blog)

Not sure what to make of this.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com...ve-5g-is-safe/

Quote:

We Have No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe The technology is coming, but contrary to what some people say, there could be health risks

Quote:

“Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.” The scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals.

Quote:

Instead, we should support the recommendations of the 250 scientists and medical doctors who signed the 5G Appeal that calls for an immediate moratorium on the deployment of 5G and demand that our government fund the research needed to adopt biologically based exposure limits that protect our health and safety.

I suggest reading the whole thing. It's not that long.

Thoughts?

via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/2Mr1O4A