dimanche 14 juillet 2019

5G Mobile Technology

I've created a YouTube playlist with both mainstream and conspiracy videos here: 5G Must Be Stopped. But this thread isn't meant to argue about why or if it should be stopped. I think this will be inherent during a cursory overview, and that 5G will fail [in the U.S., at least at the scale it's envisioned achieving by technocrats] after people's awareness reaches critical mass. I mean to educate and open discussion on people's experiences with the new technology.

The topic of health issues and EMF is to be discussed elsewhere:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=336468
Yet the thread phrased it as a question ("Is 5G Technology Really A Health Risk?"), with the OP introducing the issue using a conspiracy-minded video link (same as #3 of my playlist) that includes dross about chemtrails.... To save you some time, I've compiled some links regarding the proven health issues, scientific studies, and related activism here:

https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/
https://scientists4wiredtech.com/
https://www.saferemr.com/2018/11/NTP...reports31.html
https://microwavenews.com/news-cente...inal-rf-report
https://ethics.harvard.edu/files/cen...ncy_alster.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin_Pall
https://ehtrust.org/
https://ia802302.us.archive.org/28/i...g_workbook.pdf
https://bioinitiative.org/
https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/5...ts-to-bullets/
https://www.americansforresponsiblet...ntific-studies
https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/results/areas/cellphones/
https://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal
https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploa...ns-4.16.19.pdf
https://www.kdrv.com/content/news/Sc...511283802.html
https://legiscan.com/LA/text/HR145/2...-ErYdirW6nba_0
http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/...mLYCNK3_3AymSo
https://www.ntd.com/doctors-call-for...ks_339335.html
https://www.vcstar.com/story/news/lo...ey/1224775001/
https://www.govtech.com/network/San-...-Backlash.html
https://www.thedenverchannel.com/new...ers-on-schools
https://www.koin.com/news/civic-affa...warning-signs/
https://www.latimes.com/socal/daily-...510-story.html
https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/anti-te...-bern/44956038
https://m.timesunion.com/news/articl...o-13843495.php
https://www.kdrv.com/content/news/Gr...510001741.html
https://wlos.com/news/local/local-gr...-5g-technology
https://www.longislandpress.com/2019...-anti-5g-rally
http://www.thebrillionnews.com/2019/...f-5g-wireless/
https://www.gq.com/story/warning-cell-phone-radiation
https://www.facebook.com/babysafeproject
https://principia-scientific.org/pet...se-5g-roll-out



How does 5G work?

5G stands for 5th generation. Previous generations of cell service work from towers that provide coverage of about 10 miles (video link), up to 22-45 miles across land. 5G needs line of sight with its range of ~300 meters, or less than 1,000 feet between relay antennae. These will be installed in a variety of setups, including devices on streetlamps, utility poles, corners of buildings (as seen here in NYC), and small cell towers on poles erected where no such configuration is possible. The WIFI boxes will need to be installed inside also, since the millimeter waves don't travel through buildings.


- as seen at https://www.5gcrisis.com/identify (not hotlinked)

A common mistake is saying 5G means 5 Gigahertz. Numerous frequencies are being used for 5G. There is low, mid, and high band, which engineer Pawel Wypychowski divides into 2 categories, low being less than 7 GHz, and high, which is 24 - 71 GHz. See a screenshot from his slide at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrBiLbhvZCs#t=10m25s



FYI, see video explaining MIMO, "Everything You Need to Know About 5G": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEx_d0SjvS0&t=2m51s

Seen at 26:30 in the Pawel Wypychowski video, after hearing that about 80% of traffic will be for 4K/8K video, we see the projected sales figures:



That amounts to more than 700 million devices installed around the planet. Consider insect and bird population reduction, exacerbated by the required tree-cutting. Misinformation unfortunately taints truth about the tree cutting when "conspiracy theorists" point to the wrong examples. See https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-tr...elgium.t10506/ There are many relevant examples of tree cutting. If you speak Italian, see the video "5G: The Massacre of Trees" linked in the luogocomune.net article https://www.luogocomune.net/LC/23-en...e-degli-alberi at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17pohG0Z0Q0 (grain of salt...)
See also a Facebook video from Ann Marie Carey in England: https://www.facebook.com/annmumcarey...1627169095710/ and a Florida-area story at https://tallahasseereports.com/2017/...-canopy-roads/ Additionally, UK planning documents about 5G infrastructure specifically address the issue: https://assets.publishing.service.go...iderations.pdf The signal doesn't go into buildings, except somewhat through windows, which is why the WIFI units from Samsung are sometimes stuck there.

Quote:

Wireless Node
A cell site in your neighborhood creates a 5G signal, which is transmitted wirelessly to your home.
Receiver
This receives the 5G signal, and relays it to a router inside your home. It's usually placed on or near a window.
Router
This creates a Wi-Fi network from the 5G signal. It's powered by 5G wirelessly, instead of with cables. If needed, we'll add free Wi-Fi extenders for extra coverage.
- https://www.verizonwireless.com/5g/home/

While not billed as 5G, the SpaceX Starlink system of satellites (nearly 12,000) will use high "V-band" and "Ka-band" for their internet broadband system. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starli..._constellation) and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giQ8xEWjnBs Find the Starlink thread here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com...d.php?t=337070 Speaking of satellites and 5G, but not necessarily Starlink, Bloomberg points out that NOAA is afraid that 5G may interfere with storm prediction: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/video...trackers-video "5G Technology Could Disrupt Hurricane Trackers."

Speeds about 10x faster than 4G (around 1 Gbps depending on location) can be attained if you are in the limited coverage area (and if it's not raining or you're inside next to your 5G WIFI). Low latency is the big seller for financial transactions (especially for Starlink), self-driving cars and networked robotics. 4G has about 45 millisecond response time; 5G, about 1 ms (Says CNBC at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DG3pMcNNlw#t=55s ) "Remote medical procedures" are becoming reality through robotics, virtual reality (VR), and 5G. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu9G7ef9uBg#t=1m37s from the Wall Street Journal.

Really, 5G isn't for cell phones. But people will buy them anyway, despite the fact that the phones get too hot and automatically switch back to 4G. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahsvlm4Mb7E#t=1m42s ) The automotive industry has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in the tech. (link) Uber is banking on it. The Internet of Things also relies on 5G becoming a reality.

All the data generated by networked sensors promises a world where privacy is no longer an issue. Your location doesn't need to be triangulated by authorities if you have a 5G phone, so if an IoT sensor is triggered when you have been documented in the same location with your phone at that time, you may be targeted for questioning by law enforcement... and any related data may be sold to the highest bidder. (See video at 15:00: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXbvL0uZkrY#t=14m30s ) So you'll see more ads that have ID'd you and used your recent activity on the web (assuming you're logged into Google/YouTube, Facebook, etc.) to compare with your interactions in the IoT universe. You can unlock your front door, start a blender, turn off lights, etcetera -- with your phone. So, then, can others. Just like people have hacked into networked baby monitors and webcams... which is why you should cover the cameras on your devices with tape (like Zuckerburg). The phone is always listening for you to say "Hey Google." What else is it listening for? One investigation confirms: everything -- to advertise, at least: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBnDWSvaQ1I

Where Is 5G?

Only T-Mobile has a coverage map so far:
https://www.t-mobile.com/coverage/ou...-coverage-maps
While speedtest.net is compiling its own map: https://www.speedtest.net/ookla-5g-map I've compiled a list of cities currently served (in part):

Verizon:
Chicago, Houston, Indianapolis, Sacramento, and Minneapolis, select areas of Denver, and starting July 1st: Providence, RI. Also "parts" of seven more cities: Austin, Los Angeles, Nashville, Orlando, San Diego, San Francisco, and San Jose. Verizon plans to launch the following cities in 2019:
Atlanta, Boston, Charlotte, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Dallas, Des Moines, Detroit, Kansas City, Little Rock, Memphis, Phoenix, Salt Lake City, Washington, D.C.
(sources: https://www.verizonwireless.com/5g/ and https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile...on-5g-rollout/ ) Coverage will be spotty for some time. (Sacramento complains: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oyn1b9BjK_c )

AT&T:
Atlanta, Charlotte, Raleigh, Dallas, Houston, Indianapolis, Jacksonville, Louisville, Oklahoma City, New Orleans, San Antonio and Waco, Texas -- recently added are: Austin, Los Angeles, Nashville, Orlando, San Diego, San Francisco, and San Jose
(source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/...19/3409787002/ )

Sprint:
Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, and Kansas City. Coming soon in New York, Washington D.C., Los Angeles, Phoenix....
(source: https://www.sprint.com/en/landings/5g.html )

T-Mobile:
June 28, just launched in parts of Cleveland, Atlanta, Dallas, Las Vegas, Los Angeles and New York. T-Mobile may merge with Sprint, FYI.
(sources: https://www.cleveland19.com/2019/06/...Z3ap148iOJvphY and https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/...19/3409787002/ )


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/2jX1IGl

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire