I've never actually been a part of, or directly seen, how the jury thing works, except in fiction. My understanding is these guys don't spell out their reasons. This case probably illustrates why that's a terrible idea!
You don't expect a random set of folks off the street to present detailed nuanced explanations for their judgments, which is what you expect (and often do get) from judges, but surely knowing why the jury decided what they decided -- and in fact what exactly they meant by it -- adds some entirely necessary context to the decision.
Split from here: You don't expect a random set of folks off the street to present detailed nuanced explanations for their judgments, which is what you expect (and often do get) from judges, but surely knowing why the jury decided what they decided -- and in fact what exactly they meant by it -- adds some entirely necessary context to the decision.
via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/2Whii3m
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire