Folks
In the past you have been very helpful in clearing up my understanding of these issues.
What I'm trying to clarify is what would have been an early Victorian's (1840's) view of a middle class person in society holding one of the following positions on religion:
1. Misotheist
2. Theodicy
3. Dystheism
4. Anthropodicy
Now my present understanding is that misotheist would be viewed with great hostility, theodicy and dystheism would be viewed as alarming and reprehensible and anthropodicy less so. Would this be correct?
Thanks
In the past you have been very helpful in clearing up my understanding of these issues.
What I'm trying to clarify is what would have been an early Victorian's (1840's) view of a middle class person in society holding one of the following positions on religion:
1. Misotheist
2. Theodicy
3. Dystheism
4. Anthropodicy
Now my present understanding is that misotheist would be viewed with great hostility, theodicy and dystheism would be viewed as alarming and reprehensible and anthropodicy less so. Would this be correct?
Thanks
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/2GbY2tx
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire