Straight out of Catch-22:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...loyalty-pledge
Already, The Orange BLOATUS is umming and ahhing about the need to do this. Says he won't sign such an oath unless he is the winner. Any more proof needed of a mental breakdown?
Catch-22 was a tragi-comedic anti-war rant. In it, the Glorious Loyalty Oath Crusade was conceived as a means to exclude a character from the crusade to make him appear disloyal, a cardinal sin. Is this what is happening to The Donster? Could it happen to a nicer psychopath?
Quote:
|
The Republican National Committee’s chairperson has said that all GOP primary candidates should sign a pledge promising to support the eventual party nominee if they wish to participate in the presidential debates. Ronna McDaniel, the RNC’s leader since 2017, told CNN in an interview Sunday that even though the debate criteria have not yet been released, the loyalty pledge should nevertheless be a “no-brainer” for the party’s presidential hopefuls. “If you’re going to be on the Republican National Committee debate stage asking voters to support you, you should say, ‘I’m going to support the voters and who they choose as the nominee’,” McDaniel told CNN host Dana Bash. “Anyone getting on the Republican national committee debate stage should be able to say, ‘I will support the will of the voters and the eventual nominee of our party,’” she added. |
Already, The Orange BLOATUS is umming and ahhing about the need to do this. Says he won't sign such an oath unless he is the winner. Any more proof needed of a mental breakdown?
Catch-22 was a tragi-comedic anti-war rant. In it, the Glorious Loyalty Oath Crusade was conceived as a means to exclude a character from the crusade to make him appear disloyal, a cardinal sin. Is this what is happening to The Donster? Could it happen to a nicer psychopath?
via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/m1pcIJk
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire