Just another conspiracy theory;
on 9/10/2001 (the day before the 911 attacks, conveniently) Donald Rumsfeld officially made it known that $2.3 trillion ($2,300,000,000,000) was "missing", "unaccounted" for from the Pentagon books. This money was (in all probability) used to subsidise, in effect create the "tech platforms" as we know them - ever find it odd how Google found the money to build its absolutely vast server farms so early on? Advertising revenue? Really? - and extend its long-established 'influence' of the so-called legacy media (in which the CIA has long acknowledged it's had "assets" working since the 1950's, practically form its inception) to the internet as ADSL lines were being rolled out across the developed world.
The Google parent company is Alphabet Inc. - the very word that the CIA itself used in the term it coined as far back as the 60's for the collective arms of federal government (as is often the case, it seems certain parties couldn't help making their little in-jokes).
A pivotal part of strategy was creating the same bloated, compartmentalised bureaucracy in these organisations as in government, stuffing them with thousands upon thousands of well-paid but barely competent drones - "moderators", "trust and safety officers" and such like - who literally ticked the right boxes (on their job application forms).
(The "whizz-kid geniuses" who became richer than Midas, the likes of Zuckerberg and Dorsey, would have been carefully selected and groomed for their positions - there's plenty about Zuckerberg's career in particular that is otherwise inexplicable).
Despite the ocean of cash, this couldn't be maintained indefinitely and the first to succumb to the haemorrhaging of money in its wage bills was Twitter, which gave Musk the opportunity for his 'hostile' take-over bid. More recently the pattern seems to be extending to others, not least the daddy of them all, Google, in its recent announcement of thousands of abrupt sackings.
If you're not au fait with the current proceedings, I'd suggest a search in Youtube for "Forbes house oversight twitter".
on 9/10/2001 (the day before the 911 attacks, conveniently) Donald Rumsfeld officially made it known that $2.3 trillion ($2,300,000,000,000) was "missing", "unaccounted" for from the Pentagon books. This money was (in all probability) used to subsidise, in effect create the "tech platforms" as we know them - ever find it odd how Google found the money to build its absolutely vast server farms so early on? Advertising revenue? Really? - and extend its long-established 'influence' of the so-called legacy media (in which the CIA has long acknowledged it's had "assets" working since the 1950's, practically form its inception) to the internet as ADSL lines were being rolled out across the developed world.
The Google parent company is Alphabet Inc. - the very word that the CIA itself used in the term it coined as far back as the 60's for the collective arms of federal government (as is often the case, it seems certain parties couldn't help making their little in-jokes).
A pivotal part of strategy was creating the same bloated, compartmentalised bureaucracy in these organisations as in government, stuffing them with thousands upon thousands of well-paid but barely competent drones - "moderators", "trust and safety officers" and such like - who literally ticked the right boxes (on their job application forms).
(The "whizz-kid geniuses" who became richer than Midas, the likes of Zuckerberg and Dorsey, would have been carefully selected and groomed for their positions - there's plenty about Zuckerberg's career in particular that is otherwise inexplicable).
Despite the ocean of cash, this couldn't be maintained indefinitely and the first to succumb to the haemorrhaging of money in its wage bills was Twitter, which gave Musk the opportunity for his 'hostile' take-over bid. More recently the pattern seems to be extending to others, not least the daddy of them all, Google, in its recent announcement of thousands of abrupt sackings.
If you're not au fait with the current proceedings, I'd suggest a search in Youtube for "Forbes house oversight twitter".
via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/4EL3V10
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire