vendredi 19 octobre 2018

Cell Microwave Harm - Fact or myth?

Santa, Global Warming and Cell Microwave Harm.

According to Big Corporates and Politicians there is no difference. They are all myths.

According to peer reviewed science papers, only Santa has no proof whatsoever.

Big Business is happy to support the myth of Santa because of profits gained in Xmas sales.

The Cell Industry is controlling the agencies that say they are "protecting" the public. These agencies are protecting the industry.

Many posters here are not skeptics on this subject, they are "believers" that only ionizing radiation does harm. I once was one also, but having researched the science, I do not believe the myth that cell microwaves are harmless. Learn some microbiology - like I did.

Living tissue is made up of cells which have a very thin lipid membrane. There is a positive charge across this membrane because of an excess of sodium and calcium ions on the outside. Special proteins embed themselves in the membrane and keep the potential balanced. If the potential changes, they can open (or close) to keep the ionic imbalance constant. They let one ion at a time in single file. These are studied using "patch electrodes" which can monitor the current and voltage on a single channel.

Nerves cells use this mechanism to signal one another. If a signal is to be sent down a nerve fiber (axon) it does this by causing a disruption in the sodium ionic balance and uses this to "trip" other ion gates and send a signal to the synapses.

This delicate balance of ions can cause oxidation stress if homeostasis is unbalanced by microwaves and/or ionizing radiation. Cells can repair a lot of damage in order to survive and reproduce. This repair mechanism is much reduced in older people, and therefore older people are prone to cancer and to microwave harm.

In babies and young kids, the oxidative stress leads to problems, many of them linked to our thought processes and our emotions. Autism is linked to calcium ion channel dysfunction. Microwaves can cause such dysfunction.

Autism in children is increasing. Some say it is due to better screening and some say that they are being integrated into regular schools. Does that properly account for the increase? I say not.

There are thousands of studies indicating harm. ICNIRP discounts these using simple phrases like "inconclusive" and "contradictory" without explanation.

In March 2018 the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) did a peer review of one study they did. The found "clear evidence", "some evidence", "equivocal evidence" of carcinogenic activity with various votes of two panels. There were no votes of "no evidence".

https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/about_...180328_508.pdf


via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/2PIcqLE

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire