On a different thread, someone mentioned Benghazi. And while people think there was no wrongdoing by the white house, in a sense, "the buck stops here."
I believe the buck stops at the president. But does anyone else?
4 million people work for the executive branch. If only 1 percent commit a violation in a year, the president is responsible for the commission of over 100 violations a day. Several of those a day are likely worth resignation.
It seems to me the president should be in a constant state of vacancy until we find one that can actually reduce the number of resignation worthy violations to zero.
What does everyone else think? Do you agree the buck stops with the president? If so, am I misunderstanding the meaning of the buck stopping?
I believe the buck stops at the president. But does anyone else?
4 million people work for the executive branch. If only 1 percent commit a violation in a year, the president is responsible for the commission of over 100 violations a day. Several of those a day are likely worth resignation.
It seems to me the president should be in a constant state of vacancy until we find one that can actually reduce the number of resignation worthy violations to zero.
What does everyone else think? Do you agree the buck stops with the president? If so, am I misunderstanding the meaning of the buck stopping?
via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/L1yhbTz
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire