In honor of the late Michel Gauquelin, who was hounded to death (he committed suicide), if what I hear is true, by those who faked their information, more on who these people and urls where I have read about the whole debacle, if you ask (to follow as promised in the other thread), I would like to try to prove with a whole new set of data, the statistical claims that Michel Gauquelin put forward about certain astrological or horoscopic patterns being (very) statistically significant among certain professions, like famous athletes and medical doctors.
(This means that scientifically speaking, it seems that somehow the placements of certain of the planets has a large statistically significant effect on at least career success in certain fields like professional athletics in this case; since Loss Leader has said this is too broad a sample, I have decided to try to statistically prove the significance of certain astrological positions at birth in the case of professional athletes, if not famous athletes, which term, "famous" Loss Leader also balks at saying that "fame" is too subjective to scientifically determine, although we could set criteria such as professional athletes who belong to professional athletics teams; there's no question there! See Loss Leader's comments in further posts.)
I will only use birth data, meaning, month, day, year, city, state, and country, and time of birth, e.g., 1 am, 3:15 pm, 12:23 pm, etc. as the case may be that is the most accurate in the field of astrology, namely Lois Rodden's AA, Accurate Accurate information, consisting of a Birth Certificate or Birth Record, see here:
http://ift.tt/1Ezptkw
Lois Rodden's Astro-Databank is legendary in the field!
(Loss Leader also balks at this saying we cannot get enough accuracy in the birth data, although this is the most accurate there is anywhere and all we have to do, again, is define the terms of what we will accept as accurate in the protocol. I think what I'm saying is totally fair and feasible!)
Among many of my other accomplishments, I have been studying and using astrology as an autodidact for 45 years or since I was 12. I'm very familiar with the symbolism and can very easily inform any statistician on what to look for. There are thousands of cases worldwide for us to use.
Thank you for your continued interest. Any further questions, please let me know! !
Loss Leader's first set of comments and my rebuttal with further comments I will post in another post.
(This means that scientifically speaking, it seems that somehow the placements of certain of the planets has a large statistically significant effect on at least career success in certain fields like professional athletics in this case; since Loss Leader has said this is too broad a sample, I have decided to try to statistically prove the significance of certain astrological positions at birth in the case of professional athletes, if not famous athletes, which term, "famous" Loss Leader also balks at saying that "fame" is too subjective to scientifically determine, although we could set criteria such as professional athletes who belong to professional athletics teams; there's no question there! See Loss Leader's comments in further posts.)
I will only use birth data, meaning, month, day, year, city, state, and country, and time of birth, e.g., 1 am, 3:15 pm, 12:23 pm, etc. as the case may be that is the most accurate in the field of astrology, namely Lois Rodden's AA, Accurate Accurate information, consisting of a Birth Certificate or Birth Record, see here:
http://ift.tt/1Ezptkw
Lois Rodden's Astro-Databank is legendary in the field!
(Loss Leader also balks at this saying we cannot get enough accuracy in the birth data, although this is the most accurate there is anywhere and all we have to do, again, is define the terms of what we will accept as accurate in the protocol. I think what I'm saying is totally fair and feasible!)
Among many of my other accomplishments, I have been studying and using astrology as an autodidact for 45 years or since I was 12. I'm very familiar with the symbolism and can very easily inform any statistician on what to look for. There are thousands of cases worldwide for us to use.
Thank you for your continued interest. Any further questions, please let me know! !
Loss Leader's first set of comments and my rebuttal with further comments I will post in another post.
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1FaGJ4l
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire