For any who might have missed the debate Tuesday evening, it may be seen on Youtube:
http://ift.tt/1aYQ2YL
What I was listening to was more of a debate on the age of the Earth than on evolution although the two topics are related. Ham is well schooled in the arguments against evolution, but he believes in a literal interpretation of Genesis and a roughly six thousand year old universe; that is pretty much impossible to defend. Nye, on the other hand, strikes me as a sort of a yuppie and an acolyte of Carl Sagan's who has not made any sort of a real effort to keep up with science topics which relate to origins questions; it should have been a lot easier for somebody who was on top of such topics to pick him apart. Ham, unfortunately, was not up to it.
A minimal list of things which Bill Nye either does not know or does not want to talk about regarding science include the following....
http://ift.tt/1l6eo3l
http://ift.tt/1aYQ2YL
What I was listening to was more of a debate on the age of the Earth than on evolution although the two topics are related. Ham is well schooled in the arguments against evolution, but he believes in a literal interpretation of Genesis and a roughly six thousand year old universe; that is pretty much impossible to defend. Nye, on the other hand, strikes me as a sort of a yuppie and an acolyte of Carl Sagan's who has not made any sort of a real effort to keep up with science topics which relate to origins questions; it should have been a lot easier for somebody who was on top of such topics to pick him apart. Ham, unfortunately, was not up to it.
A minimal list of things which Bill Nye either does not know or does not want to talk about regarding science include the following....
http://ift.tt/1l6eo3l
via JREF Forum http://ift.tt/1gTvnaP
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire