http://www.infowars.com/exclusive-hi...to-east-coast/
http://charlotte.cbslocal.com/2013/0...leston-harbor/
http://www.infowars.com/sen-graham-w...g-nuke-report/
http://www.infowars.com/video-confro...nuke-transfer/
I know, I know, Infowars as a source.... :rolleyes:
I at first didn't really think anything of this other than Alex Jones and his organization doing their typical fear mongering. I noticed that the article about the 'nuclear weapons intelligence' came out after the article about Senator Lindsey Graham saying what he said. So I assumed they made the info up to scare viewers.
Just now I tried checking the the nuke transfers discussion video upload time to compare to the time of Senator Graham making his fear mongering statement. I originally compared the article upload times rather than the Graham article time to the nuke transfer discussion video upload time. I had forgot that YouTube uploads don't have the exact time of an upload, only the date. So I'm not sure exactly when they got this information, before or after the statement by Graham, Infowars claims before.
I accidentally came across the fourth link above. Infowars' Anthony Gucciardi makes a call to the Dyess Airforce Base and when he asks about transfers, the woman on the line mentions 'weapon transfers.'
Needless to say, it spooked me. :boxedin: Why wouldn't she think of personnel or document transfers first? It's certainly somewhat alarming, to me at least.
Some surprisingly skeptical thoughts in the Infowars' articles' comments were about another call he made before on Tuesday, September 3rd, claiming he mentioned weapons then.
He did indeed mention a nuclear arms transfer, but the woman in the second call claims that he must have talked to someone else and that they didn't get a number. It doesn't sound like the same woman to me.
So why would she mention a "weapons transfer" first, and at the same time claim to not know about the previous call?
Here are the two calls, back to back:
Tuesday, September 3rd, 2013:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4bb8r0-poM&t=7m50s
Friday, September 6th, 2013:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeinDCH6TUE&t=1m38s
Your thoughts on this?
http://charlotte.cbslocal.com/2013/0...leston-harbor/
http://www.infowars.com/sen-graham-w...g-nuke-report/
http://www.infowars.com/video-confro...nuke-transfer/
I know, I know, Infowars as a source.... :rolleyes:
I at first didn't really think anything of this other than Alex Jones and his organization doing their typical fear mongering. I noticed that the article about the 'nuclear weapons intelligence' came out after the article about Senator Lindsey Graham saying what he said. So I assumed they made the info up to scare viewers.
Just now I tried checking the the nuke transfers discussion video upload time to compare to the time of Senator Graham making his fear mongering statement. I originally compared the article upload times rather than the Graham article time to the nuke transfer discussion video upload time. I had forgot that YouTube uploads don't have the exact time of an upload, only the date. So I'm not sure exactly when they got this information, before or after the statement by Graham, Infowars claims before.
I accidentally came across the fourth link above. Infowars' Anthony Gucciardi makes a call to the Dyess Airforce Base and when he asks about transfers, the woman on the line mentions 'weapon transfers.'
Needless to say, it spooked me. :boxedin: Why wouldn't she think of personnel or document transfers first? It's certainly somewhat alarming, to me at least.
Some surprisingly skeptical thoughts in the Infowars' articles' comments were about another call he made before on Tuesday, September 3rd, claiming he mentioned weapons then.
He did indeed mention a nuclear arms transfer, but the woman in the second call claims that he must have talked to someone else and that they didn't get a number. It doesn't sound like the same woman to me.
So why would she mention a "weapons transfer" first, and at the same time claim to not know about the previous call?
Here are the two calls, back to back:
Tuesday, September 3rd, 2013:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4bb8r0-poM&t=7m50s
Friday, September 6th, 2013:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeinDCH6TUE&t=1m38s
Your thoughts on this?
via JREF Forum http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=265064&goto=newpost
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire