http://yankeeskeptic.com/2013/09/25/...-on-pit-bulls/
So I wrote this as it seems often skeptics can't agree on a middle ground. GMOs are life saving wonders, or poison. How about, life saving wonders but controlled in such a way as to not help the poor people that need them so very much. When does profit ("well they invented it, so they deserve to make money. yes, THAT much money") win out of the moral imperative of saving lives? Or when does the issue of population control, rather than feeding the masses come up as a question of debate? (these are just what I've been reading, not opinions held)
However, instead of GMOs, I decided to go with Pit Bulls. It's the same thing, either for or against but I hoped that skeptics would be better able to take a middle ground.
So I wrote this as it seems often skeptics can't agree on a middle ground. GMOs are life saving wonders, or poison. How about, life saving wonders but controlled in such a way as to not help the poor people that need them so very much. When does profit ("well they invented it, so they deserve to make money. yes, THAT much money") win out of the moral imperative of saving lives? Or when does the issue of population control, rather than feeding the masses come up as a question of debate? (these are just what I've been reading, not opinions held)
However, instead of GMOs, I decided to go with Pit Bulls. It's the same thing, either for or against but I hoped that skeptics would be better able to take a middle ground.
via JREF Forum http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=265876&goto=newpost
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire