Because this is what VDARE thinks.
Personally I'm always in favor of diversity as it generally strengthens rather than weakens a large organization.
Also.....how in the world is the Navy discriminating against heterosexuals?
Quote:
In what the Washington Post called the biggest bribery case the Navy has confronted in years, the skipper of a naval cruiser and a senior logistics officer allegedly gave classified information to a contractor regarding ship movements, in exchange for prostitutes, tickets to Lady Gaga concerts (!!!), and cash. The information, which imperiled national security, was allegedly used by the contractor to defraud the Navy (i.e., the white American net tax base) out of millions of dollars. The background: it is simply a fact is that the U.S. Navy now systematically discriminates against qualified white Americans in favor of politically protected non-whites. As Admiral Mike Mullen put it during his tenure as chief of naval operations, diversity is a strategic imperative. But Flemings expose resulted in no scandalbecause our ruling elite doesnt care about military preparedness, merit, or illegal, unconstitutional discrimination against heterosexual, white men. Seventy years ago, the white, meritocratic U.S. Navy destroyed the Imperial Japanese Navy. But, after two generations of peace, todays Navy is simply the worlds most expensive racial socialist welfare agency. Absent real change, it will sink when it faces a real crisisalong with the future of the historic American nation. |
Personally I'm always in favor of diversity as it generally strengthens rather than weakens a large organization.
Also.....how in the world is the Navy discriminating against heterosexuals?
via JREF Forum http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=268954&goto=newpost
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire