A prominent religious who says he's a scientist claims that our Universe had to have been intelligently created. He went on to say that had the situation during creation been even slightly different the Universe as we know it would not exist at all.
Christopher Hitchens counter argued the for the most part our Universe is deadly to life. He further stated that while energy and matter existed much of this creation was a waste if a creator waned living things. Again I agree with him.
Despite our efforts to find life in outer space with our very best scientific equipment and efforts we have not discovered another inhabited planet with a civilization.
So why were lifeless masses of rock and soil created with no life much less intelligent life on them created?
I believe creation merely follows the science of physics and chemistry and that life on earth is a coincidental by product of these sciences.
Christopher Hitchens counter argued the for the most part our Universe is deadly to life. He further stated that while energy and matter existed much of this creation was a waste if a creator waned living things. Again I agree with him.
Despite our efforts to find life in outer space with our very best scientific equipment and efforts we have not discovered another inhabited planet with a civilization.
So why were lifeless masses of rock and soil created with no life much less intelligent life on them created?
I believe creation merely follows the science of physics and chemistry and that life on earth is a coincidental by product of these sciences.
via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/3t7ZsNF
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire