Maybe not the most unique fantasy version of "Who Did 9/11", but it has a lot of woo.
Why use the reality version of 19 terrorists and four plane when you can have the Billionaires and thousands of others in on the murder of thousands.
What is the definition of skeptic that 9/11 truth uses?
Why does 9/11 truth ignore evidence to make up failed fantasy?
Ignore the 19 murderers, add thousands in some anti-government fantasy.
Someone need to flesh out the technician stuff. What remote control was used? Where do the silent explosives come from?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pablonovi (Post 11331727)
WHO DID 9/11:
1) WHO MADE THE DECISION: In my opinion, the basic decision to do 9/11 was made by "the collective" of the 400 US Billiionaires (they, afterall, are/were the only "group" with: Means, Opportunity and Motive). CUI BONO? The 400 US Billionaires. In terms of Motive, THE most important of the 3, Arabs/Muslims had the MOST TO LOSE; only insane people could have thought that it would be good for the Palestinians and other Arabs of the world; and insane people could not have planned much less pulled off a 9/11. Of everybody on the planet THEY had the LEAST MOTIVE - the y had the least to win, the most to lose. 9/11 was THE greatest transfer/theft of wealth in all of history. No way that just fell into the laps of the very people who already had the most wealth & power on the planet. 2a) WHO MAPPED OUT THE PLAN? AND SUPERVISED ITS CARRYING OUT? Who "did" it in terms of planning the actual details of it? Mostly officials and/or bureaucrats within the top ranks of the US political establishment (Executive Branch, Military, CIA, FBI, Mayor of NYC, FEMA. 2b) WHO SUPERVISED THE COVER-UP? A lot of those in the above "2a); plus the 911 (C)omission and the mass media amongst various others. 3) WHO ACTUALLY CARRIED IT OUT? Mostly a lot of technicians: remote-controllers, explosive-techs, evidence-removal "garbage" men, (I wouldn't be surprised if a good percent of these people are silenced permanently: either thru assassination or big pay-offs or living new lives in protective custody type situations. ----- btw, isn't this Forum called: International SKEPTICS Forum? Even if my "theory" is wrong; I believe it is 100% worthy enough, skeptical enough to be worth a serious discussion. Don't you too? Or are a lot of you already 100% sure that the US Gov is always a force for only good; and NEVER does False Flags, Inside Jobs and Big Lies? ----- P.S. ... P.P.S. In my first paragraph here I referred to "the collective" (deliberately in quotes). My intention with the term and the quote-marks around it was to INDICATE that some significant portion of the 400 US Billionaires had to have been in on the decision and/or at least were guaranteed their fair-share (if they were amongst those who was not consulted directly initially). Consultation with every last one would not have been absolutely necessary because if there's one things Billionaires understand it's the needs, wants and tendencies of their fellow Billionaires. Those who did the initial deciding must have known that they could count on ZERO opposition amongst the 400; and any hesitancy could have been assuaged with a billion $ or so out of the spoils. |
What is the definition of skeptic that 9/11 truth uses?
Why does 9/11 truth ignore evidence to make up failed fantasy?
Ignore the 19 murderers, add thousands in some anti-government fantasy.
Someone need to flesh out the technician stuff. What remote control was used? Where do the silent explosives come from?
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1ZN2P4E
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire