"All 3 buildings showed, conclusively that the vertical load capacity of the columns were greater than the weight above. This is obvious, by design. But to be proven conclusively, we see impact holes in towers 1 and 2 yet the surrounding columns were able to carry the redistributed load.
Therefore, *if* each building's collapse was caused by fire, once the fire weakened floors collapsed, the net acceleration must be up, as the unaffected floors have a vertical load capacity greater than the weight above. We already proved this.
Therefore, the collapsing descent speed must slow down to a stop (or topple sideways) if fire was the main collapse trigger. The buildings must not collapse completely due to fire, period. The collapse must slow to a stop due to net force, work, and energies. This didn't happen."
From an AE911 petition signer.
Comments? Seems like a Chandler clone in a few ways.
Therefore, *if* each building's collapse was caused by fire, once the fire weakened floors collapsed, the net acceleration must be up, as the unaffected floors have a vertical load capacity greater than the weight above. We already proved this.
Therefore, the collapsing descent speed must slow down to a stop (or topple sideways) if fire was the main collapse trigger. The buildings must not collapse completely due to fire, period. The collapse must slow to a stop due to net force, work, and energies. This didn't happen."
From an AE911 petition signer.
Comments? Seems like a Chandler clone in a few ways.
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1WlBzKr
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire