[Moderated] Continuation: Latest Bigfoot "evidence" Part Two

This thread has become long and unwieldy, so I have closed the original and opened this continuation thread. As always, the split point is arbitrary, and participants are welcome to quote from the previous thread into this one. On a related note, please keep your participation on topic, civil and polite, and refrain from attacking the arguers. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.

Posted By:Agatha

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Shrike (Post 10587852) I love this stuff: Skeptic: "What's a bigfoot?" 'Footer: "Oh, it's this magnificent boss of the woods - 8, 9 and sometimes 10' tall - weighing hundreds of pounds!" Skeptic: "Wow, that sounds pretty cool! What do they eat?" 'Footer: "Well they run down elk and kill them with a swipe of their massive forearm! They leap to grab wild hogs and then smash them against tree trunks! But when they're really hungry they eat . . . half an apple."

That was my first run in with Sasfooty, she posted a pic of an apple that was nibbled on by Bigfoot according to her.

I responded with that's an apple that a horse has snacked on......it looked very similar to pic below just less bites. Anyone who's ever feed a horse an apple would immediately recognize it.



Needless to say our relationship was never the same :(

via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1FKfO0J