Sexual misconduct allegations against Radford, Shermer, et al. Part 2

Continuation of this thread

Posted By:zooterkin

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brive1987 (Post 10088914) Note Radford's reference to "the document". Clearly there was a final document in play and delivered to Baxter. This is the one Radford claims to have posted without change. And there has been no explicit denial of this from the KS camp in their releases - let alone the simple expedient of releasing the variant document in their possession.

If we imagine for a moment that Radford did change the text before publishing it, why would Baxter and/or Stollznow then release the real agreed-upon document given that it would then be able to be used as evidence against them in the lawsuit?

via JREF Forum http://ift.tt/1wUiPEe