"In 1964 John Bell proposed a mechanism to test for the existence of these hidden variables, and he developed his famous inequality as the basis for such a test. He showed that if the inequality were ever not satisfied, then it would be impossible to have a local hidden variable theory that accounted for the spin experiment." -- http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...nequality.html
With local particles, Bell's inequality must hold true in a classical sense. We can however cause a violation of Bell's inequality by having particles as classical wave packets that share sine wave components. The Fourier transform shows, given infinite resolution, that all waveforms can be defined as sums of individual sine waves of different amplitudes, frequencies and phases. And there is the possibility that two or more wave packets share individual sine waves. That's the equivalent of entanglement of particles in quantum mechanics. No information is transmitted between the wave packets, since a change in one individual sine wave will directly affect all particles (wave packets) that share that sine wave.
With local particles, Bell's inequality must hold true in a classical sense. We can however cause a violation of Bell's inequality by having particles as classical wave packets that share sine wave components. The Fourier transform shows, given infinite resolution, that all waveforms can be defined as sums of individual sine waves of different amplitudes, frequencies and phases. And there is the possibility that two or more wave packets share individual sine waves. That's the equivalent of entanglement of particles in quantum mechanics. No information is transmitted between the wave packets, since a change in one individual sine wave will directly affect all particles (wave packets) that share that sine wave.
via JREF Forum http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=270646&goto=newpost
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire