Steel gets weaker as it gets heated right?
What else happens? Why then couldn't the NIST get the experimental proof to support its theory? Why did the NIST need to manipulate data in its computer modelling so as to achieve a failure and collapse?
People continue to talk about the impact of a 500,000 lb object doing 500 mph when one of the buildings that fell wasn't subject to this? Two were, one wasn't. So let's stick to the science.
Tell me whether the speed of the falling mass was decreasing, increasing or remaining constant. Just choose one of the three and tell us how it relies on the NIST's information.
What else happens? Why then couldn't the NIST get the experimental proof to support its theory? Why did the NIST need to manipulate data in its computer modelling so as to achieve a failure and collapse?
People continue to talk about the impact of a 500,000 lb object doing 500 mph when one of the buildings that fell wasn't subject to this? Two were, one wasn't. So let's stick to the science.
Tell me whether the speed of the falling mass was decreasing, increasing or remaining constant. Just choose one of the three and tell us how it relies on the NIST's information.
via JREF Forum http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=271635&goto=newpost
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire