Florida vs. Jardines, 5-4, him and the 4 liberal justices: You can't bring a dog onto a porch to sniff for marijuana, then use that to get a warrant. That violates searching the inside.
Kyllo vs. US, 5-4, him and the 4 liberals: You can't use new tech to see inside a home without a warrant, even if it is passive. IR scanning for heat from marijuana growing in this case.
And he was on the losing side of the case that approved warrantless attached device tracking of cars.
In general, new tech not present when the founders wrote the 4th Amendment should not empower the government with magical new invasive abilities.
Kyllo vs. US, 5-4, him and the 4 liberals: You can't use new tech to see inside a home without a warrant, even if it is passive. IR scanning for heat from marijuana growing in this case.
And he was on the losing side of the case that approved warrantless attached device tracking of cars.
In general, new tech not present when the founders wrote the 4th Amendment should not empower the government with magical new invasive abilities.
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1Q1wPHR
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire