Quote:
I archived the essay here. It never received a completed edit so apologies for typos or a few rants on sentences. Oye. And thus concluded the ‘reasoned debate’ about ‘evidenced based’ facts with the juvenile Rational Wiki community. |
Source: http://ift.tt/1cMjy5z
Here is his essay:
http://ift.tt/1zyeZkn
Also this is not completely true because rationalwiki writes that there was a essay so they do not deny that there was a critical essay about them from him:
Quote:
They then deleted the essay from Rational Wiki from all of the archives. As if it was never there. |
Source: http://ift.tt/1cMjy5z
However if you go the the site you get this:
Quote:
This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 22:15, 18 April 2015 Miekal (Talk | contribs) deleted page Essay:Rome Viharo revisits Rational Wiki, a critique (not when its incoherant ramblings. He has hus own website he can host this on., we have no reason to do so for him) 22:11, 18 April 2015 FuzzyCatPotato (Talk | contribs) restored page Essay:Rome Viharo revisits Rational Wiki, a critique (122 revisions restored: Why not? Is dissent/criticism/ranting incoherently forbidden? Does a username somehow change something?) 21:59, 18 April 2015 Miekal (Talk | contribs) deleted page Essay:Rome Viharo revisits Rational Wiki, a critique (because bons don't need essays where thet bitch we don't support them) 21:57, 18 April 2015 FuzzyCatPotato (Talk | contribs) restored page Essay:Rome Viharo revisits Rational Wiki, a critique (122 revisions restored: why?) |
Source: http://ift.tt/1zyeZkp
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1cMjy5B
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire