A day early but I'm probably going to be busy tomorrow
During the Russo-Japanese war in 1904 the Russian Navy deployed ships from it's Baltic Fleet to the Pacific to reinforce it's forces there (which had been badly depleted by Japanese naval activities). Due to the winter ice the fleet was forced to sail an extremely long route (~30,000km in all) around Europe and, it was initially planned, through the Mediterranean and Suez canal (with supplies of coal crammed everywhere there was space and even bags piled on deck).
The initial part of the journey route took the 45 ships through the North Sea. The sailors were worried by the newly developed torpedo boats, which the Japanese had used to good effect in their attack on Port Arthur in January 1904, and the possibility of clandestinely laid minefields.
There was a distinct atmosphere of 'torpedo boat panic' that led to a number of incidents separate to the one at Dogger Bank. There were reports (from Russian Naval Intelligence) that the Japanese had clandestinely assembled torpedo boats in isolated Norwegian fjords, though this was utterly untrue.
However there were torpedo boats being built for Japan in Britain, along with Japanese crews training up to take delivery, and neither of these facts was particularly secret. Add to this a level of paranoia, to assume the British would allow the Japanese to launch an attack out of British ports, and there was a basis for concern.
The voyage began on the 16th of October 1904, the fleet (now the 'Second Pacific Squadron') departed from Libau. The start of the epic voyage was inauspicious; the fleet flagship Knyaz Suvorov ran aground and one of the escorting cruisers lost its anchor chain. While the fleet waited for the tide to refloat the grounded flagship (and the cruiser to retrieve its misplaced anchor) one of the escorting torpedo boat destroyers rammed the battleship Oslyaba (probably accidentally) and had to return to Reval (now Tallin).
These incidents would set the tone for the voyage.
During the trip through the Baltic and North seas the Russian ships fired on the Swedish steamer Aldebaran, the German trawler Sonntag and the French sailing vessel Guyane along with a number of small craft (which were attempting to deliver Russian consular dispatches) when passing near the Danish coast.
After surviving several attacks from phantom Japanese
torpedo boats and submersibles, and negotiating a non-existent minefield, the fleet reached the Dogger Bank.
On the night of 21/22 October 1904 the 'Gamecock' fishing fleet (operating from the port of Hull) encountered a fleet of warships operating in the North Sea. The fishermen assumed the ships were British and watched their maneuverings, what one trawler skipper described as a "brilliant spectacle". It was only after the trawler Mino, was hit by shells that they realised that they were being fired upon.
Over the course of the next twenty minutes the Russian warships fired more than one thousand shells from their secondary and tertiary armament (mostly 37mm and 75mm guns), many at ranges of less than a hundred metres.
With their nets down the trawlers had no opportunity to quickly escape from the bombardment, though few hits were actually scored thanks to the generally abysmal Russian gunnery.
The shelling ended when the Russians saw a group of larger vessels approaching and departed; the ships were actually another element of the Russian fleet.
One boat (the Crane) was sunk, and two of it's crew were killed. The others were saved by the efforts of other trawlers, though several men suffered serious injuries. A third man later died of injuries sustained; more than thirty more were injured. The casualties would have been worse but for the presence of a Mission ship (the Joseph and Sarah Miles) carrying a doctor and medical facilities.
The British weren't the only casualties of the firing; two Russians were killed when ships fired on each other and the cruisers Donskov and Aurora damaged.
As the fishing boats lacked radio, the news of the incident had to wait until the trawlers returned to Hull to spread. When this happened word spread rapidly; thousands lined the waterfront at St. Andrew's Dock. A delegation travelled by train to London where they were received at the Foreign Office on the morning of Saturday the 22nd. Word spread rapidly with crowds gathering in Trafalgar Square. The Russian Ambassador was booed as he left the embassy to answer the Foreign Office's summons.
The British reaction was furious; not only had the Russians fired upon fishing boats in international waters but they hadn't tried to aid the damaged and sinking boats even after they'd stopped firing. The feeling was that the Russians should have realised, from the distinctive design of the fishing boats, their displayed lights and their nets down, that the boats were harmless.
The leader in The Times said: "It is almost inconceivable that any men calling themselves seamen, however frightened they might be, could spend twenty minutes bombarding a fleet of fishing boats without discovering
the nature of their target".
The Russians were prohibited from transiting the Suez canal or using British controlled ports to re-fuel.
Britain prepared for war, with the Royal Navy's Home Fleet ships (including 26 battleships) readied for deployment and cruisers deployed to shadow the Russian fleet.
Britain was at the time a Japanese ally; the Anglo-Japanese Treaty had been signed in 1902, and was under discussion for renewal (this would happen in August 1905).
King Edward VII took a personal interest, meeting with several survivors and awarding the Albert Medal for actions in rescuing those wounded.
While there was a risk of war no-one really wanted one and the British government (under Balfour), the Royal Navy (under newly appointed First Sea Lord 'Jackie' Fisher), the French government and the Russian ambassador (Count Benckendorff) worked to calm matters. Newspapers were prevailed upon to urge moderation.
An international enquiry was agreed upon, empanelled in Paris, and this eventually blamed Admiral Rozhestvensky and compensation (£66,000) was paid.
Perhaps though in a slightly different universe these events lead to the Anglo-Russian war and a different world.
During the Russo-Japanese war in 1904 the Russian Navy deployed ships from it's Baltic Fleet to the Pacific to reinforce it's forces there (which had been badly depleted by Japanese naval activities). Due to the winter ice the fleet was forced to sail an extremely long route (~30,000km in all) around Europe and, it was initially planned, through the Mediterranean and Suez canal (with supplies of coal crammed everywhere there was space and even bags piled on deck).
- In fact they actually were forced to take an even longer route around the coast of Africa.
The initial part of the journey route took the 45 ships through the North Sea. The sailors were worried by the newly developed torpedo boats, which the Japanese had used to good effect in their attack on Port Arthur in January 1904, and the possibility of clandestinely laid minefields.
There was a distinct atmosphere of 'torpedo boat panic' that led to a number of incidents separate to the one at Dogger Bank. There were reports (from Russian Naval Intelligence) that the Japanese had clandestinely assembled torpedo boats in isolated Norwegian fjords, though this was utterly untrue.
However there were torpedo boats being built for Japan in Britain, along with Japanese crews training up to take delivery, and neither of these facts was particularly secret. Add to this a level of paranoia, to assume the British would allow the Japanese to launch an attack out of British ports, and there was a basis for concern.
- It wasn't the first time sailors had demonstrated such jumpiness; during the Spanish-American war US Navy ships had seen torpedo boats in ocean swells, coastal rocks and even trains, firing on such mirages a number of times.
The voyage began on the 16th of October 1904, the fleet (now the 'Second Pacific Squadron') departed from Libau. The start of the epic voyage was inauspicious; the fleet flagship Knyaz Suvorov ran aground and one of the escorting cruisers lost its anchor chain. While the fleet waited for the tide to refloat the grounded flagship (and the cruiser to retrieve its misplaced anchor) one of the escorting torpedo boat destroyers rammed the battleship Oslyaba (probably accidentally) and had to return to Reval (now Tallin).
These incidents would set the tone for the voyage.
During the trip through the Baltic and North seas the Russian ships fired on the Swedish steamer Aldebaran, the German trawler Sonntag and the French sailing vessel Guyane along with a number of small craft (which were attempting to deliver Russian consular dispatches) when passing near the Danish coast.
- Ironically one of the undelivered dispatches was a personal message for the fleet commander (Rozhestvensky) from Tsar Nicholas telling him of his promotion to Vice-Admiral rank.
After surviving several attacks from phantom Japanese
torpedo boats and submersibles, and negotiating a non-existent minefield, the fleet reached the Dogger Bank.
- Dogger Bank is a huge sandbank (about 17,500km²) in the North Sea, the remains of the ancient 'Doggerland' land bridge between Britain and Europe. It's in a shallow area of the North Sea about 100km from east coast of England and has been a popular fishing area for centuries.
On the night of 21/22 October 1904 the 'Gamecock' fishing fleet (operating from the port of Hull) encountered a fleet of warships operating in the North Sea. The fishermen assumed the ships were British and watched their maneuverings, what one trawler skipper described as a "brilliant spectacle". It was only after the trawler Mino, was hit by shells that they realised that they were being fired upon.
Over the course of the next twenty minutes the Russian warships fired more than one thousand shells from their secondary and tertiary armament (mostly 37mm and 75mm guns), many at ranges of less than a hundred metres.
With their nets down the trawlers had no opportunity to quickly escape from the bombardment, though few hits were actually scored thanks to the generally abysmal Russian gunnery.
The shelling ended when the Russians saw a group of larger vessels approaching and departed; the ships were actually another element of the Russian fleet.
One boat (the Crane) was sunk, and two of it's crew were killed. The others were saved by the efforts of other trawlers, though several men suffered serious injuries. A third man later died of injuries sustained; more than thirty more were injured. The casualties would have been worse but for the presence of a Mission ship (the Joseph and Sarah Miles) carrying a doctor and medical facilities.
The British weren't the only casualties of the firing; two Russians were killed when ships fired on each other and the cruisers Donskov and Aurora damaged.
- This wasn't the only time the Russians would shell the Aurora during the voyage; while the fleet was ported at Madagascar she was hit by a live shell accidentally loaded during the firing of a salute. The ship had an interesting history, playing a role in the February 1917 revolution and a key role in the October revolution, firing the shot that signalled the start of the assault on the Winter Palace. It's the sole survivor of the fleet, anchored in St. Petersburg today as a commissioned museum ship.
As the fishing boats lacked radio, the news of the incident had to wait until the trawlers returned to Hull to spread. When this happened word spread rapidly; thousands lined the waterfront at St. Andrew's Dock. A delegation travelled by train to London where they were received at the Foreign Office on the morning of Saturday the 22nd. Word spread rapidly with crowds gathering in Trafalgar Square. The Russian Ambassador was booed as he left the embassy to answer the Foreign Office's summons.
The British reaction was furious; not only had the Russians fired upon fishing boats in international waters but they hadn't tried to aid the damaged and sinking boats even after they'd stopped firing. The feeling was that the Russians should have realised, from the distinctive design of the fishing boats, their displayed lights and their nets down, that the boats were harmless.
The leader in The Times said: "It is almost inconceivable that any men calling themselves seamen, however frightened they might be, could spend twenty minutes bombarding a fleet of fishing boats without discovering
the nature of their target".
- Though this is somewhat unfair as Russia didn't operate trawlers and the sailors may have been unfamiliar with such the boats. But then again, they were firing at ranges of less than 100m against searchlight illuminated boats and in a popular fishing area.
The Russians were prohibited from transiting the Suez canal or using British controlled ports to re-fuel.
Britain prepared for war, with the Royal Navy's Home Fleet ships (including 26 battleships) readied for deployment and cruisers deployed to shadow the Russian fleet.
- The fact that the incident occurred on the 99th anniversary of the Battle of Trafalgar rather exacerbated matters.
Britain was at the time a Japanese ally; the Anglo-Japanese Treaty had been signed in 1902, and was under discussion for renewal (this would happen in August 1905).
- This was the major reason France didn't become involved in the Russo-Japanese War, despite her alliance with Russia. This would activate the mutual defense portions of Anglo-Japanese treaty.
King Edward VII took a personal interest, meeting with several survivors and awarding the Albert Medal for actions in rescuing those wounded.
While there was a risk of war no-one really wanted one and the British government (under Balfour), the Royal Navy (under newly appointed First Sea Lord 'Jackie' Fisher), the French government and the Russian ambassador (Count Benckendorff) worked to calm matters. Newspapers were prevailed upon to urge moderation.
An international enquiry was agreed upon, empanelled in Paris, and this eventually blamed Admiral Rozhestvensky and compensation (£66,000) was paid.
Perhaps though in a slightly different universe these events lead to the Anglo-Russian war and a different world.
via International Skeptics Forum http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=284305&goto=newpost
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire