From what worked on another forum and perhaps with new management in place, might be implemented here.
In that forum it is moderated by a working scientist who is familiar with the field. This is his directive I would like to see followed here in this forum which purports to be educational.
Now do we have a moderator here that is up to the task? Feedback appreciated.
In that forum it is moderated by a working scientist who is familiar with the field. This is his directive I would like to see followed here in this forum which purports to be educational.
Quote:
This thread is for discussing the science of climate change. It has the operating assumptions that climate change is happening, and that it has an anthropogenic origin. From the 2007 IPCC Summary for Policymakers: Quote:
Discussions of the pros and cons of the science go here. Climate change denial does not go here. Members wanting to post general remarks denying climate change or its anthropogenic basis, or off-topic references to what your favourite journalist, politician or 'radio personality' says about it all, should post them in the Climate Science Denial thread. This thread will be strictly moderated. Off-topic, inflammatory, irrational or non-science based posts will be either binned or moved to the Denial thread as appropriate. Continuing to post OT or inflammatory posts will invite moderator attention, guidance, and corrective action as required. Members are invited to contact a forum moderator if they need further clarification, or to use the report system if posts need to be reviewed by staff. |
Now do we have a moderator here that is up to the task? Feedback appreciated.
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1vqcUJc
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire