In another thread the assertion was made:
I reject all claims in the above post as false.
I have studied the footage of the ejecta and in every one of them a spiralling smoke trail can be seen. The speed and trajectory are consistent in all footage. The eventual landing point for the engine is consistent with exit velocity and fall time from the height of the exit point. The exit point is consistent with the entry angle and speed of the impacting plane.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfetzer (Post 10102569) Sure. It was found under a steel scaffolding on an undamaged sidewalk. Any object that massive at its alleged velocity would have shattered the sidewalk. It was of the wrong make to have come from a Boeing 767. Jack White discovered Fox News footage of three agents wearing FBI vests unloading something heavy from a white van at that intersection. They even left the dolly behind, which can be seen in the photos I present. My presentation at The Midwest 9/11 Truth Conference runs about one hour and covers the problems with A&E911 and Judy Wood in relation to the Twin Towers and presents the proof that none of those planes crashed on 9/11. |
I reject all claims in the above post as false.
I have studied the footage of the ejecta and in every one of them a spiralling smoke trail can be seen. The speed and trajectory are consistent in all footage. The eventual landing point for the engine is consistent with exit velocity and fall time from the height of the exit point. The exit point is consistent with the entry angle and speed of the impacting plane.
via JREF Forum http://ift.tt/1qJiVhC
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire