The Haldane dilemma describes one kind of time problem which evolutionists enjoy ignoring.
Walter Remine’s simplistic explanation of it goes like this:
In a rational world, that should be as far as most people need to read. That basically says that even given a rate of evolutionary development which is fabulously beyond anything which is possible in the real world, starting from apes, in ten million years the best you could possibly hope for would be an ape with a slightly shorter tail. People who have tried to work the numbers for more realistic rates of substitution speak of quadrillions of years...
The other kind of time problem which evolutionists have and don't like to talk about has to do with soft tissue turning up to an increasing extent in dinosaur remains.
http://kgov.com/dinosaur-soft-tissue
https://www.google.com/search?client...UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
There is zero possibility of the kinds of tissue these articles describe lasting for even one million years, much less for tens or hundreds of millions as we've been indoctrinated to believe.
Walter Remine’s simplistic explanation of it goes like this:
Quote:
Imagine a population of 100,000 apes or “proto-humans” ten million years ago which are all genetically alike other than for two with a “beneficial mutation”. Imagine also that this population has the human or proto-human generation cycle time of roughly 20 years. Imagine that the beneficial mutation in question is so good, that all 99,998 others die out immediately (from jealousy), and that, next day, the pair with the beneficial mutation has 100,000 kids and thus replenishes the herd. Imagine that this process goes on like that for ten million years, which is more than anybody claims is involved in “human evolution”. The max number of such “beneficial mutations” which could thus be substituted into the herd would be ten million divided by twenty, or 500,000 point mutations which, Remine notes, is about 1/100 of one percent of the human genome, and a miniscule fraction of the 2 to 3 percent that separates us from chimpanzees, or the half of that which separates us from Neanderthals. |
In a rational world, that should be as far as most people need to read. That basically says that even given a rate of evolutionary development which is fabulously beyond anything which is possible in the real world, starting from apes, in ten million years the best you could possibly hope for would be an ape with a slightly shorter tail. People who have tried to work the numbers for more realistic rates of substitution speak of quadrillions of years...
The other kind of time problem which evolutionists have and don't like to talk about has to do with soft tissue turning up to an increasing extent in dinosaur remains.
http://kgov.com/dinosaur-soft-tissue
https://www.google.com/search?client...UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
There is zero possibility of the kinds of tissue these articles describe lasting for even one million years, much less for tens or hundreds of millions as we've been indoctrinated to believe.
via JREF Forum http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=267050&goto=newpost
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire