Hi.
Look at the comments here:
http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/...iens-debunked/
Notice something? This is "SKEPTIC" Magazine and "The Skeptics Society"'s website. What's up with what I see in those comments? There seems to be little actual skepticism and a whole lot of people promoting one woo/basis-in-reality-questionable claim or another. I find it odd because, while I'd expect there to be some woo since woo promoters might choose to target such a site for debate, I'd expect there to be much more of a skeptical response given by all the skeptical readers of Skeptic magazine. After all, the magazine is targeted toward skeptics, no?
Look at the comments here:
http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/...iens-debunked/
Notice something? This is "SKEPTIC" Magazine and "The Skeptics Society"'s website. What's up with what I see in those comments? There seems to be little actual skepticism and a whole lot of people promoting one woo/basis-in-reality-questionable claim or another. I find it odd because, while I'd expect there to be some woo since woo promoters might choose to target such a site for debate, I'd expect there to be much more of a skeptical response given by all the skeptical readers of Skeptic magazine. After all, the magazine is targeted toward skeptics, no?
via JREF Forum http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=267584&goto=newpost
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire