This thread has been split from here. As is usual with wholesale splits for a change of topic, it may be that some posts which should have been moved were not, and vice versa. If so, please report the posts so that the mod team can take appropriate action. If the title I've given the thread doesn't really describe the thread topic accurately please report any post in the thread with your suggestion for a more appropriate title. |
Posted By:Agatha
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by baron (Post 12150173)
That doesn't matter. The point is that the principle is correct. A gravitational force can theoretically exist in the absence of mass.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by baron (Post 12150173)
As I already said, if you blast the Earth and convert it into radiation then that gravitational field is no longer being maintained by that mass, by definition. If you dispute this, show me the equate you would use to calculate it.
|
(We've got a bit of a problem with baryon conservation, by the way, but let's not worry about another level of impossibility right now.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by baron (Post 12150173)
You can argue about how energy has not been lost, of course it hasn't, but that doesn't change the facts as relate to my analogy.
|
Dave
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/2rlbLIm
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire