European Canadian hypocrisy

http://ift.tt/1UxpiAP

Quote:

"Hasan, born in England, pushes aggressively against Collier with the question: "Am I or am I not an indigenous Briton?" Is he, a brown Indian, any less indigenous to Britain than a white born native? His rationale is that native born Brits have not become a minority in London since many non-Whites counted as immigrants were actually born in Britain. Amanda, a human rights lawyer who believes that European nations must accept all the poor people of the world, gushes over the Indian's questioning, entitling her article: "This 1-minute debate perfectly captures the shameful racism of anti-immigration arguments". Actually what this debate captures is a white male who has been cuckolded into denying the obvious fact that an indigenous Briton can only refer, at its core, to the historic people who founded England and inhabited this nation for centuries.

so because his parents weren't born in a country, he cannot be considered to be a native at all? I think you confuse immigrants with non-whites in general.

Quote:

One cannot compare the episodic migrations of genetically related people into England over many centuries with the current program of mass immigration from all over the world in the last few decades.

Oh? Similarly related? You treated the Irish very differently. http://ift.tt/1UxpgJc

Quote:

He is proud to say he is "Indian" but could never live in putrid, congested, and bacteria-infested India, and so the only card he has to play is to make the most of white ethnomasochistic tendencies by bragging how immigrant non-Whites are indigenous, when in truth they have contributed nothing significant to the history and culture of these lands.

I should not that India is mostly putrid due to the lasting effects of colonialism...and is getting better.
Thoughts?

via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1N1q4Uo