This is the thread that was closed before i could respond
http://ift.tt/1qZDaps
I clearly state that the discovery was made as a result
of astral travelling and i outline quite clearly that it requires
a state of moral clarity to perform this. This is the paranormal
claim. The discoveries are the evidence, not the claim itself.
Insomnia - followed by a deep 'sleep' is apart of the prcoess.
One must remain conscious whilst shifting into the 'dreaming' state.
This description is more clearly described on the website.
None of you were reading what was said, simply performing
the standard aTheist knee-jerk reaction.
The spinning kite, was unpowered, so its not quite the same
discovery, although similar.
It is the process of making the discovery itself that is paranormal,
not the final result. The final results are the evidence so that
you take it seriously. I state this quite clearly.
If you care to read the entire website you will see about
30 other discoveries, including the precise nature of
dark energy, dark matter, the innacuracies in post newtonian
misconceptions of gravity ... AND ...
(ta-dah)
The revision of the errors in Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity.
Perhaps you need to start here:
http://www.flight-light-and-spin.com...ty-revised.htm
Please take this seriously or ignore it.
With all due respect, I know most people that post here
are not taking themselves seriously so i understand
that superficial disregard is the standard response.
Once more the discoveries are themselves improvements
on standard physics, and are not paranormal. It is the process
whereby they are acquired that IS CERTAINLY paranormal.
If you follow my method, you should (hopefully) make similar discoveries,
and thereby have a positivist (personally empirical) paranormal experience.
The conditions for this process are not as simple as flying a kite,
if they were, there would not be a $1m price tag on it.
If they were impossible, there would likewise not be a $1m price tag on it.
After all nobody is offering $1m for the last 40 years for somebody to
prove an impossible claim like surfing a solar flare
or flying to the moon using only the wings of a butterfly... hmm?
;-j
http://ift.tt/1qZDaps
I clearly state that the discovery was made as a result
of astral travelling and i outline quite clearly that it requires
a state of moral clarity to perform this. This is the paranormal
claim. The discoveries are the evidence, not the claim itself.
Insomnia - followed by a deep 'sleep' is apart of the prcoess.
One must remain conscious whilst shifting into the 'dreaming' state.
This description is more clearly described on the website.
None of you were reading what was said, simply performing
the standard aTheist knee-jerk reaction.
The spinning kite, was unpowered, so its not quite the same
discovery, although similar.
It is the process of making the discovery itself that is paranormal,
not the final result. The final results are the evidence so that
you take it seriously. I state this quite clearly.
If you care to read the entire website you will see about
30 other discoveries, including the precise nature of
dark energy, dark matter, the innacuracies in post newtonian
misconceptions of gravity ... AND ...
(ta-dah)
The revision of the errors in Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity.
Perhaps you need to start here:
http://www.flight-light-and-spin.com...ty-revised.htm
Please take this seriously or ignore it.
With all due respect, I know most people that post here
are not taking themselves seriously so i understand
that superficial disregard is the standard response.
Once more the discoveries are themselves improvements
on standard physics, and are not paranormal. It is the process
whereby they are acquired that IS CERTAINLY paranormal.
If you follow my method, you should (hopefully) make similar discoveries,
and thereby have a positivist (personally empirical) paranormal experience.
The conditions for this process are not as simple as flying a kite,
if they were, there would not be a $1m price tag on it.
If they were impossible, there would likewise not be a $1m price tag on it.
After all nobody is offering $1m for the last 40 years for somebody to
prove an impossible claim like surfing a solar flare
or flying to the moon using only the wings of a butterfly... hmm?
;-j
via JREF Forum http://ift.tt/1ydF4cw
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire