https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sup...animous-ruling
The supreme Court unanimously ruled against the EPA regarding their regulations upon wetlands that do not permanently connect to navigable water bodies. The EPA and the Biden administration wanted to be able to regulate small wetlands that are clearly not part of the navigable Waters of the United States. But this is clearly a violation of the intent of the clean water act, and everyone in the supreme Court agreed. The clean water act allows the federal government to protect and regulate all navigable water bodies in the United States, and water bodies that connect to them on a regular basis. Wetlands that only connect to such bodies when there is a large flood, but normally are independent, are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government.
The supreme Court unanimously ruled against the EPA regarding their regulations upon wetlands that do not permanently connect to navigable water bodies. The EPA and the Biden administration wanted to be able to regulate small wetlands that are clearly not part of the navigable Waters of the United States. But this is clearly a violation of the intent of the clean water act, and everyone in the supreme Court agreed. The clean water act allows the federal government to protect and regulate all navigable water bodies in the United States, and water bodies that connect to them on a regular basis. Wetlands that only connect to such bodies when there is a large flood, but normally are independent, are not under the jurisdiction of the federal government.
via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/7VMrfd3
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire