So, I saw this posted elsewhere today.
General Flynn is trying to blackmail people!
Even just a few years ago, I would have dismissed this as obvious nonsense. But now? Eh, why not. Could we have long last found an actual conspiracy?!?
But seriously, it has all the hallmarks of the old style CT nonsense. Namechecks a well-know person, uses his own "Private Intelligence" firm as a source, claims to have evidence like recordings, but doesn't seem to actually publish that evidence, claims the Government knows about it, even though there's been no public actions relating to this by the government.
Also tosses in things that don't make that much sense: "he was told to "accomplish the mission even if you have to use domestic terrorism."" How does terrorism help you blackmail people? Are they just going to off them if they don't have enough dirt on them?
But then there's this:
So, apparently this guy actually has blown the lid off a major scandal in the past, which suggests he's not nuts. But he certainly sounds nuts. I mean, he called his "private intelligence company" "Tactical Rabbit", for god's sake.....
Oh, and he would totally have had an actual meeting with Flynn himself, if his pesky lawyers hadn't warned him not to do that!
General Flynn is trying to blackmail people!
Quote:
|
A Republican Senate candidate alleged over the weekend that Michael Flynn, the retired general and former national security adviser, has sought damaging information on elected officials in a number of states, with the apparent goal of blackmailing them into supporting conspiratorial election audits meant to reinforce Donald Trump's false claims that the 2020 election was fraudulent. |
Even just a few years ago, I would have dismissed this as obvious nonsense. But now? Eh, why not. Could we have long last found an actual conspiracy?!?
But seriously, it has all the hallmarks of the old style CT nonsense. Namechecks a well-know person, uses his own "Private Intelligence" firm as a source, claims to have evidence like recordings, but doesn't seem to actually publish that evidence, claims the Government knows about it, even though there's been no public actions relating to this by the government.
Also tosses in things that don't make that much sense: "he was told to "accomplish the mission even if you have to use domestic terrorism."" How does terrorism help you blackmail people? Are they just going to off them if they don't have enough dirt on them?
But then there's this:
Quote:
|
Stern said he was moved to expose Flynn's alleged plot out of a moral imperative — something he said he was also familiar with as a corporate whistleblower at HSBC, where he exposed the bank's billion-dollar money laundering scheme. The case ended with a $1.92 billion fine against HSBC. |
Oh, and he would totally have had an actual meeting with Flynn himself, if his pesky lawyers hadn't warned him not to do that!
via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/3brhH6D
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire