I'm starting this thread to put an end to the perpetual derailment of the 2020 Democratic Candidates Tracker - Part II thread.
Oh, I'll freely admit they existed. I was merely pointing out that I proved they don't demonstrate what you naively thought they demonstrated.
Oh really, now? Then to what set of data are you actually referring here:
I haven't seen it.
I don't care whether you agree with me or not. I'm merely pointing out you simply have no evidence with which to support your opinion.
If anyone else wants to join in....Welcome! I totally understand if you'd prefer to skip this circus, however.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belz... (Post 12815222)
Good, so now you admit that they existed, at least.
|
Quote:
And I told you I didn't say it contradicted it. You're just not following. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belz... (Post 12813421)
I rejected the poll bacause a much more reliable set of data contradicts it.
|
Quote:
That's amazing. I've done the same with you! |
Quote:
I've listened. I just don't AGREE WITH YOU. You think the two are one and the same. |
Quote:
I know what it means, hence my comment. |
If anyone else wants to join in....Welcome! I totally understand if you'd prefer to skip this circus, however.
via International Skeptics Forum https://ift.tt/2LnrZZk
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire