The Trials of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito: Part 29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vixen (Post 12720607) The pair lied and lied and lied. Raff deliberately and knowingly mislead the police as did Knox. Knox WAS present during the murder of Meredith Kercher, did wash of Mez' blood from her hands and did cover up for Guede. This is spelt out large. The Supreme Court signed off on this judgment.

For the 100th time, the Supreme Court did not say this. In 2015 they wrote, in exonerating, that even if those things were true, all that the Nencini proved was that:

Quote:

Any further and more meaningful value would be, in fact, resisted by the fact - which is decisive - that no trace leading to her was found at the scene of the crime or on the victim’s body, so that - if all the above is accepted - her contact with the victim’s blood would have occurred after the crime and in another part of the house.

Why do you never respond to the ACTUAL TEXT OF THE FINDING!?

Continued from part 28. You can quote or reply to any post from that part or any previous part of the topic.

Posted By:zooterkin

via International Skeptics Forum http://bit.ly/2WvGyBu