https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...rth-high-court
"Hayden said the couples deliberate decision not to register the birth stemmed from the boys fathers unusual and somewhat eccentric beliefs about the concept of personal sovereignty."
The judgment says:
To be honest, I was impressed at how respectful the judge is towards these delusions. I would have been much more dismissive....
"Hayden said the couples deliberate decision not to register the birth stemmed from the boys fathers unusual and somewhat eccentric beliefs about the concept of personal sovereignty."
The judgment says:
Quote:
It is in this context that when a birth is registered, F considers this to be the equivalent of an entry into a ships manifest, in which the child becomes an asset to the country which has boarded a vessel to sail on the high seas.This facet of admiralty and maritime law is pervasive in Fs thinking. The essence of Fs objection is his belief that registration will cause his son to become controlled by a State which he perceives to be authoritarian and capricious. |
via International Skeptics Forum http://bit.ly/2Xuzepd
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire