https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...rth-high-court
"Hayden said the couple’s deliberate decision not to register the birth stemmed from the boy’s father’s unusual and somewhat eccentric beliefs about the concept of personal sovereignty."
The judgment says:
To be honest, I was impressed at how respectful the judge is towards these delusions. I would have been much more dismissive....
"Hayden said the couple’s deliberate decision not to register the birth stemmed from the boy’s father’s unusual and somewhat eccentric beliefs about the concept of personal sovereignty."
The judgment says:
Quote:
It is in this context that when a birth is registered, F considers this to be the equivalent of an ‘entry into a ship’s manifest’, in which the child becomes ‘an asset to the country which has boarded a vessel to sail on the high seas.’This facet of admiralty and maritime law is pervasive in F’s thinking. The essence of F’s objection is his belief that registration will cause his son to become controlled by a State which he perceives to be authoritarian and capricious. |
via International Skeptics Forum http://bit.ly/2Xuzepd
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire