http://ift.tt/2fXX0FN
The owner of Grubhub responded to the election results by sending a strongly-worded email to his employees, underlining his commitment to inclusiveness and declaring termination or resignation for any employee who disagreed. People rightly understood this to be a calling-out of Trump supporters, and now he's got a boycott on his hands.
My question is, why the strong words to begin with? If there's a cultural problem of intolerance at a company, then I can see the employer making a clear statement about where they stand and what they expect. But if the people at the company are already meeting those expectations, why would an employer want to start talking about terminations and resignations? Those aren't really topics you'd want to raise in the workplace unless absolutely necessary, right?
The owner of Grubhub responded to the election results by sending a strongly-worded email to his employees, underlining his commitment to inclusiveness and declaring termination or resignation for any employee who disagreed. People rightly understood this to be a calling-out of Trump supporters, and now he's got a boycott on his hands.
My question is, why the strong words to begin with? If there's a cultural problem of intolerance at a company, then I can see the employer making a clear statement about where they stand and what they expect. But if the people at the company are already meeting those expectations, why would an employer want to start talking about terminations and resignations? Those aren't really topics you'd want to raise in the workplace unless absolutely necessary, right?
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/2fKsRGt
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire