Here is the latest from CB:
"My take on the issue of should "FLT11" and "FLT175" have acted as they allegedly did on 9/11, and the crux of the argument is the deceleration experienced upon striking the tower wall.
Please bear with me in a bit of an experiment in the imagination,
Imagine a trash can that is loaded to aprox 75 lbs, and you have this object in your driveway, and approach it at less than 5mph and upon contact you push it and very little happens other than you have pushed it.
Now consider this if the same can were placed on a stretch of road that would allow you to accelerate you car to its max speed before contacting the object, what do you think would happen upon contact? The obvious is that you would experience a huge jolt upon contacting the object. and this is for an object that is aprox 20:1 lighter than a car. Now consider the WTC structure, allegedly FLT11 and FLT175 penetrated the wall(s) without a significant jolt, and I find that very odd that an airliner could indeed contact a wall in that manner, and not experience a huge jolt.
In addition, Ryan Mackey states " flight UA 175's components *averaged* about 75 g's of deceleration " and lets just explore what the 75g deceleration actually means. The fact of the g force figure is that any object in the aircraft, say, a ton of luggage, would exert 75 ton of force against the bulkhead in front of it. wait, it gets better, imagine a 60ft long lever, that is the wing, and consider the last bit of the wing representing about 50 lbs and under 75 g deceleration, this would act as a 3,750 lbs of force, however because its on the end of a 60ft lever, that is 225,000 lb/ft of torque against the wing mounts, this isn't rocket science, no way that the wings would stay with the aircraft under those conditions. The only hypothesis that would allow the observed behavior of "FLT11" and "FLT175" would be if the WTC wall were made of paper."
I have a couple of earlier posts from the same truther on the FB group "9/11 Truthers are Crazy.
"My take on the issue of should "FLT11" and "FLT175" have acted as they allegedly did on 9/11, and the crux of the argument is the deceleration experienced upon striking the tower wall.
Please bear with me in a bit of an experiment in the imagination,
Imagine a trash can that is loaded to aprox 75 lbs, and you have this object in your driveway, and approach it at less than 5mph and upon contact you push it and very little happens other than you have pushed it.
Now consider this if the same can were placed on a stretch of road that would allow you to accelerate you car to its max speed before contacting the object, what do you think would happen upon contact? The obvious is that you would experience a huge jolt upon contacting the object. and this is for an object that is aprox 20:1 lighter than a car. Now consider the WTC structure, allegedly FLT11 and FLT175 penetrated the wall(s) without a significant jolt, and I find that very odd that an airliner could indeed contact a wall in that manner, and not experience a huge jolt.
In addition, Ryan Mackey states " flight UA 175's components *averaged* about 75 g's of deceleration " and lets just explore what the 75g deceleration actually means. The fact of the g force figure is that any object in the aircraft, say, a ton of luggage, would exert 75 ton of force against the bulkhead in front of it. wait, it gets better, imagine a 60ft long lever, that is the wing, and consider the last bit of the wing representing about 50 lbs and under 75 g deceleration, this would act as a 3,750 lbs of force, however because its on the end of a 60ft lever, that is 225,000 lb/ft of torque against the wing mounts, this isn't rocket science, no way that the wings would stay with the aircraft under those conditions. The only hypothesis that would allow the observed behavior of "FLT11" and "FLT175" would be if the WTC wall were made of paper."
I have a couple of earlier posts from the same truther on the FB group "9/11 Truthers are Crazy.
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1Ya6TiE
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire