I feel that this subject needs its own thread.
Why did not the Justice Department follow up on the HSCA recommendation and initiate an investigation on the probable conspiracy behind the assassination of president John F. Kennedy?
I know that a NRC acoustic panel came to the conclusion that a cross talk appeared to refute the HSCA findings of five shots (not four) recorded on the DPD dictabelt. This was plain wrong though. There is five instances of cross talk on the ca five minutes recording from a stuck microphone and none of them is in perfect sync. One of them, the one closest to the shots are spot on and refutes NRC's findings.
Donald Thomas says that the probability for the five echo configurations being something other than typical rifle shots in Dealey Plaza is P=1/100 000. Thats is, if you are disputing the HSCA findings you have two choices:
1. Find flaws in the HSCA acoustics findings.
2. Find some other data/incidents that's even more improbable being wrong.
NRC couldn't do "1", so they tried "2" after being tipped of by a musician, but as I said, they where wrong and that contradicts the HSCA analysis.
The HSCA's two research team was world leading in acoustic analysis, solving the Kent. State shooting, inventing the sonar system for US Navy's nuclear submarines and real time mobile sniper detection for urban warfare.
The NRC acoustic panel included two Nobel prize winners but none was an expert on acoustics. What a peculiar bias, don't you think?
Why did not the Justice Department follow up on the HSCA recommendation and initiate an investigation on the probable conspiracy behind the assassination of president John F. Kennedy?
I know that a NRC acoustic panel came to the conclusion that a cross talk appeared to refute the HSCA findings of five shots (not four) recorded on the DPD dictabelt. This was plain wrong though. There is five instances of cross talk on the ca five minutes recording from a stuck microphone and none of them is in perfect sync. One of them, the one closest to the shots are spot on and refutes NRC's findings.
Donald Thomas says that the probability for the five echo configurations being something other than typical rifle shots in Dealey Plaza is P=1/100 000. Thats is, if you are disputing the HSCA findings you have two choices:
1. Find flaws in the HSCA acoustics findings.
2. Find some other data/incidents that's even more improbable being wrong.
NRC couldn't do "1", so they tried "2" after being tipped of by a musician, but as I said, they where wrong and that contradicts the HSCA analysis.
The HSCA's two research team was world leading in acoustic analysis, solving the Kent. State shooting, inventing the sonar system for US Navy's nuclear submarines and real time mobile sniper detection for urban warfare.
The NRC acoustic panel included two Nobel prize winners but none was an expert on acoustics. What a peculiar bias, don't you think?
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1O9h64m
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire