AE 9/11 Facebook (what year is it?)

A special message from AE 911 ... :jaw-dropp

Quote:

2015 AE911Truth European Tour — Newbury, England AE911Truth founder and architect Richard Gage's seventh presentation on Europe Tour 2015 was held at Newbury Town Hall on Saturday, the 25th of April. Event sponsor Ian Fantom, a 9/11 Truth activist since 2006 and member of the "Keep Talking" group on Google, says the townspeople's generally "positive" attitude toward those who question the 9/11 official story encouraged him to invite Gage. A questioner highlighted the discrepancy in the energy required between an organic, natural structural failure of the three World Trade Center towers and what appears to have been the controlled demolition of those buildings. Gage agreed there is a "tremendous energy differentiation" between, on the one hand, "gravitational potential energy" and, on the other, the amount of energy required to "shatter the structural steel, pulverize 90,000 tons of concrete, turn tons of metal into molten lava, and create heat clouds ten times the volume of the building in seconds." Another attendee inquired how much time it would have taken the Twin Towers to fall if there had been a natural collapse and a resulting "pancake effect," as the US government maintains happened. According to Gage, the consensus among scientists who are uncompromised by government pressure is 30 to 90 seconds — a significantly longer time than the mere 12 seconds observed by on-the-scene witnesses and video cameras. One man in the audience asked how it was that his 12 year-old daughter, who has been studying basic physics in school, understood that the near free-fall collapse of the three towers was "impossible" because "there's no resistance there" — and yet some professional physicists still defend the official premise that fires caused the destruction. The psychological explanation, responded Gage, is that "when some people recognize their worldview is under threat, they . . . come up with irrational thoughts, and they express them as if they're rational. Or they lie altogether. I've seen both." Someone else mentioned the Overton window, a political theory that explains why certain ideas are considered worthy of becoming public policy (allowed inside the window), while other ideas are shunned (kept outside the window). Because "the Establishment" decides which ideas to include or exclude and because the mainstream media now enforces that window more strictly than ever, 9/11 is on the taboo list. "So how do we expand the Overton window to include 9/11?" Gage asked. The answer: Read Owen Jones' new book, "The Establishment—and how they get away with it." Until 9/11 Truth is brought inside the window, he was advised, "you're on a fool's errand."

Oh God, the pains ... did we revert back to Richard "box man" Gage? With a sprinkle of Judy Woo ...

via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1dQpv21