Once again, the thread has grown lengthy, so this is a continuation from the previous thread, Continuation 13. For further reference, see: Part 12, Part 11, Part 10, Part 9, Part 8, Part 7, Part 6, Part 5, Part 4, Part 3, Part 2, and Part 1. |
Posted By:Agatha |
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericparoissien (Post 10544547) I didn't dream your DNA mix-up, y'all mixed up smear (which is chaos) with contamination (which is a rare constructed occurrence). If Peter Gill lectures all the DNA specialists that came before him on Meredith's case like they're 6 year olds who don't know: 1-What a DNA trace is and how to interpret it as signal/noise 2-How a judge can use a DNA expert and build his case Then no one should be embarrassed pointing at Peter Gill's simple mistake: We don't live through our day leaving a trail of DNA. DNA is produced on impact. Namely all denaturation processes: heat, friction, stress, acid, etc. RS came in significant collision with Meredith's bra. Please give it some consideration, Peter Gill is mistaken. |
You act as if you know what you are talking about. But in truth, it is the epitome of absurd arrogance and foolish behavior. Dr. Gill is a DNA expert of the highest standards. And your own expertise in DNA science is non existent. Yet you dismiss and denigrate Dr.Gill. I don't understand that. Consider the following advice "best to keep silent and have people believe you to be a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt".
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1xdGUdy
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire