There was a typical slippery slope type argument trotted out in the recent incest thread, which I'd like to explore here.
Necrophilia is another one of those horribly "squicky" paraphilia's that people almost universally shudder at and is (as far as I know) pretty much banned everywhere.
But why? There's no issue of consent, there's no possibility of offspring and no one is harmed (except the person doing the *********** possibly).
Imagine for a moment that I'm a necrophiliac and belong to an online community of like-minded weirdos. Perhaps the INF (International Necrophiliacs Forum). I then write a will which explicitly states that after death, my corpse is to be donated to one of my necrophile friends with the explicit direction that he is free to use my corpse for her own carnal pleasures. Should this be allowed?
Why? If not, why not?
Necrophilia is another one of those horribly "squicky" paraphilia's that people almost universally shudder at and is (as far as I know) pretty much banned everywhere.
But why? There's no issue of consent, there's no possibility of offspring and no one is harmed (except the person doing the *********** possibly).
Imagine for a moment that I'm a necrophiliac and belong to an online community of like-minded weirdos. Perhaps the INF (International Necrophiliacs Forum). I then write a will which explicitly states that after death, my corpse is to be donated to one of my necrophile friends with the explicit direction that he is free to use my corpse for her own carnal pleasures. Should this be allowed?
Why? If not, why not?
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1yPKlra
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire