I don't think this would be constitutional but you never know with the current composition of the Supreme Court:
Indiana Considers Banning Abortions for Down Syndrome and other reasons.
So in theory the woman still has a choice to have an abortion, but as soon as some sort of prenatal test shows that the baby might have some sort of birth defect, or even reveals the sex of the fetus, she no longer has a choice?
Notice that this makes it a crime for the doctor, so even if a woman says she wants to have an abortion for other reasons, the doctor might not want to take the risk if there's any possibility that the abortion might be for one of those reasons.
Indiana Considers Banning Abortions for Down Syndrome and other reasons.
So in theory the woman still has a choice to have an abortion, but as soon as some sort of prenatal test shows that the baby might have some sort of birth defect, or even reveals the sex of the fetus, she no longer has a choice?
Quote:
In this month's federal and state legislative anti-abortion frenzy, it takes a lot for a bill to stand out, but Indiana state senator Travis Holdman has managed to pull it off. Holdman introduced a bill that would make it a felony for a doctor to abort a pregnancy for sex-selective reasons or because of "a diagnosis or potential diagnosis of the fetus having Down syndrome or any other disability." According to RH Reality Check, "The term 'any other disability' includes: a mental disability or retardation; a physical disfigurement; Scoliosis; Dwarfism; Down syndrome; Albinism; Amelia; and physical or mental disease." Like many other anti-choice bills percolating through the state legislatures, this one is based on model legislation crafted by Americans United for Life. Bills banning sex-selective abortions are trendy among the anti-choice set because, while those abortions aren't actually common in real life, it's politically expedient to traffic in ugly stereotypes of daughter-hating Asian immigrants. But even though abortions because of a fetal diagnosis are far more common, anti-choice legislators tend to avoid going there. Indiana considered a similar bill last year and killed it. Missouri also saw a similar bill fail. North Dakota is the only state to pass such a bill into law. But while these bills are still struggling to get off the ground, the fact that they're showing up at all is indicative of the growing boldness of anti-choice legislators. Banning the non-existent problem of sex-selective abortion is an easy way to grandstand and score "pro-life" points while preening about how pro-woman you are. But banning abortions for fetal abnormalities could negatively affect all sorts of womenand their husbandsincluding those that tend to vote Republican. |
Notice that this makes it a crime for the doctor, so even if a woman says she wants to have an abortion for other reasons, the doctor might not want to take the risk if there's any possibility that the abortion might be for one of those reasons.
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1ASf30v
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire