... according to Tony Szamboti on "No Lies Radio".
Excerpt:
He also talks about NIST's refusal to provide all the inputs to their FEA or to amend their report based on Dr. Pepper's letter, and says "there are lawyers looking into that."
Not surprisingly, Tony is also a JFK conspiracy theorist. He hopes that the "truth movement" will follow the path of JFK investigations: After Geraldo Rivera showed the Zapruder film, the public demanded a new investigation. He claims the film had been "suppressed" because it showed the "back and to the left" which was "indicative of a shot from the front." And then, the HSCA found from that there were more than 3 shots, so Oswald couldn't have been the lone assassin -- the conspiracy theorists were right all along! Well, maybe someday the public will demand another 9/11 investigation, but Tony's history leaves out that (a) the "acoustic evidence" analysis that the HSCA conclusion was based on was later found to be faulty; and (b) the Zapruder film clearly shows JFK's head snapping forward immediately after the shot; and (c) the Zapruder film shows why the "back and to the left" could not possibly have been caused by momentum from the bullet: Momentum transfer is instantaneous as a bullet is slowed, but the "back and to the left" starts two frames after the hit; and it's an accelerating motion, implying a continued force which couldn't have come from a bullet that has left the scene.
He also puts in a plug for Douglas Horne's book, Inside the Assassination Records Review Board, about "two brains" and "the wounds were altered at Bethesda" after a "shell game with the caskets." According to Tony, "the truth did come out on that, eventually, and somewhat officially. However, it's radioactive to the government and they're not going to open up a new investigation." Hmmm...
Then Tony talks about his new paper posted on AE911truth.org, "25 Points of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports: The End of the Road for NIST," which he claims is "grist for the mill of a grand jury."
In short, nothing new.
Excerpt:
Quote:
“It was only some years after the issuance of the NIST Report that drawings were released, in response to a FOIA request, revealing that critical structural features in Building 7 were inexplicably missing from consideration in the Report. These critical features included stiffeners, that provided critical girder support, as well as lateral support beams which supported a beam which allegedly buckled. Only through the omission of any discussion about the stiffeners and the lateral support beams is NIST’s probable collapse sequence possible. With the inclusion of these critical features, NIST’s probable collapse sequence must be ruled out unambiguously. It is the unanimous opinion of the structural engineers who have carefully studied this matter that an independent engineering enquiry would swiftly reach the same conclusion.” |
He also talks about NIST's refusal to provide all the inputs to their FEA or to amend their report based on Dr. Pepper's letter, and says "there are lawyers looking into that."
Not surprisingly, Tony is also a JFK conspiracy theorist. He hopes that the "truth movement" will follow the path of JFK investigations: After Geraldo Rivera showed the Zapruder film, the public demanded a new investigation. He claims the film had been "suppressed" because it showed the "back and to the left" which was "indicative of a shot from the front." And then, the HSCA found from that there were more than 3 shots, so Oswald couldn't have been the lone assassin -- the conspiracy theorists were right all along! Well, maybe someday the public will demand another 9/11 investigation, but Tony's history leaves out that (a) the "acoustic evidence" analysis that the HSCA conclusion was based on was later found to be faulty; and (b) the Zapruder film clearly shows JFK's head snapping forward immediately after the shot; and (c) the Zapruder film shows why the "back and to the left" could not possibly have been caused by momentum from the bullet: Momentum transfer is instantaneous as a bullet is slowed, but the "back and to the left" starts two frames after the hit; and it's an accelerating motion, implying a continued force which couldn't have come from a bullet that has left the scene.
He also puts in a plug for Douglas Horne's book, Inside the Assassination Records Review Board, about "two brains" and "the wounds were altered at Bethesda" after a "shell game with the caskets." According to Tony, "the truth did come out on that, eventually, and somewhat officially. However, it's radioactive to the government and they're not going to open up a new investigation." Hmmm...
Then Tony talks about his new paper posted on AE911truth.org, "25 Points of Specific Concern in the NIST WTC Reports: The End of the Road for NIST," which he claims is "grist for the mill of a grand jury."
Quote:
WTC 7 – THE THIRD SKYSCRAPER 1. OMISSION OF GIRDER STIFFENERS SHOWN ON FRANKEL DRAWING #9114 2. OMISSION OF THREE LATERAL SUPPORT BEAMS ON THE 13TH FLOOR G3005 BEAM 3. WTC 7 COLLAPSE AT FREE-FALL ACCELERATION IS NOT EXPLAINED 4. VIDEOS OF THE COLLAPSE OF WTC 7 BETRAY NIST’S COMPUTER MODEL 5. CLAIMS OF INVESTIGATING CONTROLLED DEMOLITION WITHOUT TESTING FOR EXPLOSIVE RESIDUES 6. CHANGES OF STATEMENTS ON COMPOSITE BEAMS AND SHEAR STUD USE BETWEEN DRAFTS 7. REFUSING OF FOIA REQUESTS ALL THREE BUILDINGS 8. NEGLIGENCE IN SALVAGING STEEL 9. IGNORING THE RESULTS OF FEMA 403, APPENDIX C 10. INVOLVEMENT IN NOT SAVING STEEL FOR INVESTIGATION 11. FIRE SIMULATIONS AND DURATIONS ARE EXAGGERATED 12. NO DISCUSSION OF THE MOLTEN METAL FOUND IN THE RUBBLE OF THE THREE COLLAPSED BUILDINGS. 13. REFUSAL TO TEST FOR EXPLOSIVE RESIDUE 14. FAILURE TO FOLLOW STANDARD FIRE INVESTIGATION PROTOCOL THE TWIN TOWERS 15. STRIPPING OF THE FIRE PROOFING IS EXAGGERATED 16. PRE-COLLAPSE STEEL TEMPERATURES ARE EXAGGERATED 17. TESTED FLOOR ASSEMBLIES DID NOT FAIL 18. INITIATION OF COLLAPSE – “INWARD BOWING” WAS INDUCED ARTIFICIALLY 19. COLUMN STRESS DUE TO LOAD REDISTRIBUTION IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO CAUSE FAILURE 20. NO EXPLANATION GIVEN FOR HORIZONTAL PROPAGATION OF COLLAPSE 21. WTC 1 TILT OCCURRED AFTER SYMMETRICAL COLLAPSE FOR AT LEAST TWO STORIES 22. NO JOLT – CONTINUOUS ACCELERATION OF COLLAPSE WAS IGNORED 23. NO PILE DRIVER IS OBSERVED IN VIDEOS 24. COLUMN LOADS WERE CALCULATED FOR WORST CASE, NOT ACTUAL IN-SERVICE LOADS 25. MOLTEN METAL OBSERVED POURING OUT OF THE CORNER OF WTC 2 REMAINS |
In short, nothing new.
via International Skeptics Forum http://ift.tt/1DZilys
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire