dimanche 7 septembre 2014

Relativity Revised



Quote:








There are several reasons why Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity is invalid:

1) The Relative Mass Catastrophe.

2) The Photon Mass Catastrophe.

3) The Relative Velocity Mystery.

4) The Contraction of Time and Space Catastrophes.

5) Fixed Space Logic.

6) The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.



Part 1 deconstructs these reasons in turn. Part 2 then reconstructs matters into a thoroughly computable ontology.





The central method I am employing in this chapter is simply to test for internal logical consistency. The process whereby this ensues is to attempt to construct a real-time data-model of Relativity in Visual Basic 6. This is where most of the inconsistencies in Relativity become apparent.



It is just not possible to program a real-time data model if the various formulae within any theory are in contradiction to one another. This does not mean that such a data-model is necessarily correct. But a real-time data-model will inevitably show up contradictions in any theory, and so the data-model becomes a minimal benchmark for the internal logical consistency of any theory.




continue the critique

http://www.flight-light-and-spin.com...ty-revised.htm



then read the solution




Quote:








Now!

It is one thing to happily destroy a ‘Special’ theory which has been idol-worshipped for the better part of a century. It is quite another to find out precisely where the theorist went wrong, what parts of the theory still hold true, and to rebuild the theory into a logical structure which improves our understanding.



I shall make what seems to be a fair theoretical attempt at this. I am not sure what to call this theory, so for now it shall be termed: Sum Theory. It is a return to the reliability of Newton, but summed together with some ideas salvaged from Einstein’s Era.



In doing this, I had to carefully consider why it is that misconceptions were taken as true. There must have been good reasons to make the errors, and the primary method used in finding the new theory was to ask such a question as ‘why did they think mass increased as added velocity decreased?’



This has been a far more arduous task than simply realizing that Relativity does not add up. So, to the reader that is precocious enough to find flaws in what I have said:



You had better be careful! You will need to give a better answer than this if you can find such flaws.




http://www.flight-light-and-spin.com...ed-summary.htm





via JREF Forum http://ift.tt/1BllJUT

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire